ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2021
Ending the evidence gap for pregnancy, HIV and co-infections: ethics guidance from the PHASES project.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of Pregnancy Events in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for Gender Transformative Trials.AIDS and behavior · 2024Pooled it
- Obstetric Pharmacoethics: An ethical framework for obstetric pharmacology.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026Article
- Single-Dose Longitudinal Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Doravirine in Pregnant Women Living With HIV: Protocol for a Phase 1 Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- The HIV Reservoir and Immune Landscape Across the Life Course of Women: Implications for Cure Strategies.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026Review
- Exploring the pharmacokinetic mechanisms that affect bictegravir exposure during pregnancy.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Advancing ethical biomedical HIV prevention research for pregnant and lactating people.AIDS (London, England) · 2026Article
- Adolescent views on participating in HIV biomedical research during pregnancy: a qualitative analysis of motivators and barriers.AIDS care · 2026Article
- Bridging disciplinary siloes: a scoping review on the inclusion and exclusion of pregnant and lactating populations in clinical research.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Advancing the inclusion of pregnant and lactating populations in HIV PrEP research: ethical, regulatory, and surveillance recommendations from a multisectoral working group.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Ethical considerations for research involving pregnant women with HIV and their children.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Multisector global collaboration to advance the inclusion of pregnant and lactating people in HIV prevention research.AIDS (London, England) · 2025Article
- Gender equity and COVID-19 vaccine policies for pregnant people: a global analysis.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Antiretroviral Use for HIV Prevention During Pregnancy: The Need to Strengthen Regulatory and Surveillance Systems in Africa.Drug safety · 2025Article
- Investigations of Long-Acting Formulations in Children, Adolescents, and Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Using PBPK modeling to supplement clinical data and support the safe and effective use of dolutegravir in pregnant and lactating women.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Article
- Eliminating gender bias in biomedical research requires fair inclusion of pregnant women and gender diverse people.Communications medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Bridging the Evidence Gap: Sotrovimab Use in Pregnancy and the Need for Comprehensive Drug Safety Data.Drug safety · 2024Article
- The drug drought in maternal health: an ongoing predicament.The Lancet. Global health · 2024Review
- Teratology research in the shadow of the Dobbs decision.Birth defects research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWhile pregnant people have been an important focus for HIV research, critical evidence gaps remain regarding prevention, co-infection, and safety and efficacy of new antiretroviral therapies in pregnancy. Such gaps can result in harm: without safety data, drugs used may carry unacceptable risks to the foetus or pregnant person; without pregnancy-specific dosing data, pregnant people face risks of both toxicity and undertreatment; and delays in gathering evidence can limit access to beneficial next-generation drugs. Despite recognition of the need, numerous barriers and ethical complexities have limited progress. We describe the process, ethical foundations, recommendations and applications of guidance for advancing responsible inclusion of pregnant people in HIV/co-infections research. DISCUSSION: The 26-member international and interdisciplinary Pregnancy and HIV/AIDS: Seeking Equitable Study (PHASES) Working Group was convened to develop ethics-centred guidance for advancing timely, responsible HIV/co-infections research with pregnant people. Deliberations over 3 years drew on extensive qualitative research, stakeholder engagement, expert consultation and a series of workshops. The guidance, initially issued in July 2020, highlights conceptual shifts needed in framing research with pregnant people, and articulates three ethical foundations to ground recommendations: equitable protection from drug-related risks, timely access to biomedical advances and equitable respect for pregnant people's health interests. The guidance advances 12 specific recommendations, actionable within the current regulatory environment, addressing multiple stakeholders across drug development and post-approval research, and organized around four themes: building capacity, supporting inclusion, achieving priority research and ensuring respect. The recommendations describe strategies towards ethically redressing the evidence gap for pregnant people around HIV and co-infections. The guidance has informed key efforts of leading organizations working to advance needed research, and identifies further opportunities for impact by a range of stakeholder groups.
conclusionsThere are clear pathways towards ethical inclusion of pregnant people in the biomedical research agenda, and strong agreement across the HIV research community about the need for - and the promise of - advancing them. Those who fund, conduct, oversee and advocate for research can use the PHASES guidance to facilitate more, better and earlier evidence to optimize the health and wellbeing of pregnant people and their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.