Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910846›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2021

Ending the evidence gap for pregnancy, HIV and co-infections: ethics guidance from the PHASES project.

Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Richard Beigi, Linda-Gail Bekker, Benjamin H Chi, Susan E Cohn, Dázon Dixon Diallo, Joseph Eron, Ruth Faden, Elana Jaffe, Angela Kashuba and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Obstetric Pharmacoethics: An ethical framework for obstetric pharmacology.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The HIV Reservoir and Immune Landscape Across the Life Course of Women: Implications for Cure Strategies.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Anne Drapkin LyerlyDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-6920
Richard BeigiDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, UPMC Magee-Women's Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Linda-Gail BekkerDesmond Tutu HIV Centre and Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0755-4386
Benjamin H ChiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-8455
Susan E CohnDepartment of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dázon Dixon DialloSisterLove, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joseph EronDepartment of Medicine and Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Ruth FadenJohns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Elana JaffeDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Angela KashubaEshelman School of Pharmacy and Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Mary KasuleBotswana-Baylor Centre for Clinical Excellence, Gabarone, Botswana.
Carleigh KrubinerCenter for Global Development, Washington, DC, USA.
Maggie LittleKennedy Institute for Ethics and Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Joseph Mfustso-BengoCenter of Bioethics for Eastern & Southern Africa and Department of Health Systems and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Lynne MofensonElizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2818-9808
Victor MwapasaCollege of Medicine, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Lillian MworekoInternational Community of Women Living with HIV Eastern Africa, Kampala, Uganda.
Landon MyerDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Martina PenazzatoHIV Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5485-8692
Annette RidDepartment of Bioethics, The Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Roger ShapiroDepartment of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jerome Amir SinghHoward College School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
Kristen SullivanDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Marissa VicariInternational AIDS Society, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jacque WambuiNational Empowerment Network of People Living with HIV and AIDS in Kenya (NEPHAK), African Communities Advisory Board (AfroCAB), Lusaka, Zambia.
Amina WhiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Marisha WickremsinheEthox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Leslie WolfCenter for Law, Health & Society and College of Law and School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
The PHASES Project: Pregnancy and HIV/AIDS-Seeking Equitable StudyR01AI108368 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAY, SUZANNE LOUISE, LYERLY, ANNE DRAPKIN · 2015 to 2024
$6.4M
Integrating Decision Making Studies into HIV Cure Trials: A real-time longitudinal assessmentR01AI127024 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108368NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127024World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile pregnant people have been an important focus for HIV research, critical evidence gaps remain regarding prevention, co-infection, and safety and efficacy of new antiretroviral therapies in pregnancy. Such gaps can result in harm: without safety data, drugs used may carry unacceptable risks to the foetus or pregnant person; without pregnancy-specific dosing data, pregnant people face risks of both toxicity and undertreatment; and delays in gathering evidence can limit access to beneficial next-generation drugs. Despite recognition of the need, numerous barriers and ethical complexities have limited progress. We describe the process, ethical foundations, recommendations and applications of guidance for advancing responsible inclusion of pregnant people in HIV/co-infections research. DISCUSSION: The 26-member international and interdisciplinary Pregnancy and HIV/AIDS: Seeking Equitable Study (PHASES) Working Group was convened to develop ethics-centred guidance for advancing timely, responsible HIV/co-infections research with pregnant people. Deliberations over 3 years drew on extensive qualitative research, stakeholder engagement, expert consultation and a series of workshops. The guidance, initially issued in July 2020, highlights conceptual shifts needed in framing research with pregnant people, and articulates three ethical foundations to ground recommendations: equitable protection from drug-related risks, timely access to biomedical advances and equitable respect for pregnant people's health interests. The guidance advances 12 specific recommendations, actionable within the current regulatory environment, addressing multiple stakeholders across drug development and post-approval research, and organized around four themes: building capacity, supporting inclusion, achieving priority research and ensuring respect. The recommendations describe strategies towards ethically redressing the evidence gap for pregnant people around HIV and co-infections. The guidance has informed key efforts of leading organizations working to advance needed research, and identifies further opportunities for impact by a range of stakeholder groups.

conclusionsThere are clear pathways towards ethical inclusion of pregnant people in the biomedical research agenda, and strong agreement across the HIV research community about the need for - and the promise of - advancing them. Those who fund, conduct, oversee and advocate for research can use the PHASES guidance to facilitate more, better and earlier evidence to optimize the health and wellbeing of pregnant people and their children.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeBiomedical ResearchCoinfectionHIV InfectionsChildFemaleHumansPregnancyStakeholder Participationco-infectionsethicsHIVpregnancypreventionresearch

Identifiers

PMID34910846
PMCPMC8673925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.