Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910741›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

'It felt like a black hole, great uncertainty, but we have to take care for our patients'-Qualitative findings on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on specialist palliative home care.

Maximiliane Jansky, Franziska Schade, Nicola Rieder, Danica Lohrmann, Cordula Gebel, Lars Kloppenburg, Ulrich Wedding, Steffen T Simon, Claudia Bausewein, Friedemann Nauck and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ["Creativity and a Mindset Shift were Essential." Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Specialized Palliative Home: A Nationwide Online Survey].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maximiliane JanskyDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5292-2934
Franziska SchadeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Nicola RiederDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Danica LohrmannDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Cordula GebelDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8305-9176
Lars KloppenburgDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Ulrich WeddingDepartment of Palliative Care, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Steffen T SimonDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Claudia BauseweinDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Friedemann NauckDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center, Georg August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
PallPan Study Group
University of Göttingen · DEJena University Hospital · DELMU Klinikum · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected health care systems worldwide. Multidisciplinary teams provide specialist palliative home care (SPHC) for patients with incurable, severe, progressive diseases. These patients are at the same time at high risk, if infected, highly constricted by containment measures, and dependent on support.

aimTo explore i) how German SPHC teams were affected by the pandemic during the first wave, ii) which challenges they faced, and iii) which strategies helped to handle the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic for providing good SPHC.

methodFour focus groups (with representatives of 18 SPHC teams) and five guided interviews with stakeholders were conducted and analysed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsSeven key categories emerged from the data. A category in the background describes dependence on organizational characteristics (e.g. sponsorship), which varied by regional factors. Information management was a challenge to SPHC teams, as they had to collect, interpret and adapt, and disseminate information. They reported a shift in patient care because of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to restricted home visits, visitation ban in nursing homes, and difficulties for hospital, hospice and nursing home admissions. Measures to reduce risk of infection impeded teamwork. Teams relied upon their local networks in crisis management, but felt often overlooked by local health authorities. Their respective SPHC state associations supported them in information management and exchange. DISCUSSION: The pandemic has severely impacted home care for especially vulnerable seriously ill and dying people. A good network with local health providers and authorities could help to harmonize local regulations and ensure quality care for all patient groups. SPHC teams could play an important role in caring for palliative patients with COVID-19 who are not admitted to a hospital due to preferences or resources.

Indexed as

COVID-19Home Care ServicesPalliative CareFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMalePandemicsPatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2Uncertainty

Identifiers

PMID34910741
PMCPMC8673648
OpenAlexW4200102578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.