Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910588›Full record

SynthesisJCO clinical cancer informatics2021

Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Siddhi Ramesh, Sukarn Chokkara, Timothy Shen, Ajay Major, Samuel L Volchenboum, Anoop Mayampurath, Mark A Applebaum

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Explainable AI: Ethical Frameworks, Bias, and the Necessity for Benchmarks.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Applying Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Clinical Trials: Potential Impacts and Obstacles.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siddhi RameshPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Sukarn ChokkaraPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0003-1543-2239
Timothy ShenPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-2442-0101
Ajay MajorDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-7261-1335
Samuel L VolchenboumDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9863-851X
Anoop MayampurathDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0002-3010-6960
Mark A ApplebaumDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0001-9766-8477

Funding

Elucidating transcription regulation by epigenetics in neuroblastomaK08CA226237 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI APPLEBAUM, MARK ANDREW · 2018 to 2021
$826k
Using Machine Learning to Predict Clinical Deterioration in Hospitalized ChildrenK01HL148390 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MAYAMPURATH, ANOOP · 2019 to 2023
$738k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA226237NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL148390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is a need for an improved understanding of clinical and biologic risk factors in pediatric cancer to improve patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) represents the application of computational inference from advanced statistical methods that can be applied to increasing amount of data available for study in pediatric oncology. The goal of this systematic review was to systematically characterize the state of ML in pediatric oncology and highlight advances and opportunities in the field.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases for applications of ML in pediatric oncology. Query results from all three databases were aggregated and duplicate studies were removed.

resultsA total of 42 unique articles that examined the applications of ML in pediatric oncology met inclusion criteria for review. We identified 20 studies of CNS tumors, 13 of solid tumors, and nine of leukemia. ML tasks included classification, prediction of treatment response, and dose optimization with a variety of methods being used including neural network, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, naive Bayes, and support vector machines. Strengths of the identified studies included matching or outperforming physician comparators via automated analysis and predicting therapeutic response. Common limitations included significant heterogeneity in reporting standards, clinical applicability, small sample sizes, and missing external validation cohorts.

conclusionWe identified areas where ML can enhance clinical care in ways that may not otherwise be achievable. Although ML promises enormous potential in improving diagnostics, decision making, and monitoring for children with cancer, the field remains in early stages and future work will be aided by standards and guidelines to ensure rigorous methodologic design and maximizing clinical utility.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningBayes TheoremChildHumansMedical OncologyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34910588
PMCPMC8812636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.