SynthesisJCO clinical cancer informatics2021
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Oncology: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning in paediatric haematological malignancies: a systematic review of prognosis, toxicity and treatment response models.Pediatric research · 2025Pooled it
- Accelerating Pediatric Oncology Drug Development: Advances in Clinical Pharmacology, Trial Design, Non-Clinical Evidence, and Regulatory Science.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Explainable AI: Ethical Frameworks, Bias, and the Necessity for Benchmarks.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026Review
- Large Language Models Using Clinical Text in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pediatric Endocrine Tumors: Opportunities, Pitfalls, and a Roadmap for Trustworthy Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Oncology Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- M&M: an RNA-seq based pan-cancer classifier for paediatric tumours.EBioMedicine · 2025Article
- Revolutionizing precision oncology: the role of artificial intelligence in personalized pediatric cancer care.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Applying Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Clinical Trials: Potential Impacts and Obstacles.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024Article
- An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Rare Disease: A Case Study to Stratify Infection Risk in Pediatric Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease using deep learning from histological sections of post pull-through specimens: preliminary results.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
- Article
- Leveraging machine learning to identify acute myeloid leukemia patients and their chemotherapy regimens in an administrative database.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2023Article
- On the importance of interpretable machine learning predictions to inform clinical decision making in oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Prediction of chemotherapy-related complications in pediatric oncology patients: artificial intelligence and machine learning implementations.Pediatric research · 2023Review
- Machine Learning-Based Short-Term Mortality Prediction Models for Patients With Cancer Using Electronic Health Record Data: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- AI-Based Computational Methods in Early Drug Discovery and Post Market Drug Assessment: A Survey.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is a need for an improved understanding of clinical and biologic risk factors in pediatric cancer to improve patient outcomes. Machine learning (ML) represents the application of computational inference from advanced statistical methods that can be applied to increasing amount of data available for study in pediatric oncology. The goal of this systematic review was to systematically characterize the state of ML in pediatric oncology and highlight advances and opportunities in the field.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of the Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases for applications of ML in pediatric oncology. Query results from all three databases were aggregated and duplicate studies were removed.
resultsA total of 42 unique articles that examined the applications of ML in pediatric oncology met inclusion criteria for review. We identified 20 studies of CNS tumors, 13 of solid tumors, and nine of leukemia. ML tasks included classification, prediction of treatment response, and dose optimization with a variety of methods being used including neural network, k-nearest neighbor, random forest, naive Bayes, and support vector machines. Strengths of the identified studies included matching or outperforming physician comparators via automated analysis and predicting therapeutic response. Common limitations included significant heterogeneity in reporting standards, clinical applicability, small sample sizes, and missing external validation cohorts.
conclusionWe identified areas where ML can enhance clinical care in ways that may not otherwise be achievable. Although ML promises enormous potential in improving diagnostics, decision making, and monitoring for children with cancer, the field remains in early stages and future work will be aided by standards and guidelines to ensure rigorous methodologic design and maximizing clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.