SynthesisJournal of health organization and management2021
The barriers and facilitators of radical innovation implementation in secondary healthcare: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of health organization and management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Participatory Design of AI-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Impact of Proton Therapy Implementation on Processes, Patient Satisfaction, and Technology Use in a Radiation Therapy Department.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Matching implementation strategies to barriers and facilitators for a lifestyle front office in the hospital: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring barriers and facilitators for implementation of novel image-guided minimally invasive procedures: nationwide experiences on navigation bronchoscopy.BMJ open respiratory research · 2025Article
- Value of a Nationwide University Network in scaling up telemonitoring: a qualitative study.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- The organizational challenges of municipal call centers as a health service in Norway-a multiple case study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Change in Organizational Structure Influences Perceived Leadership in a Dutch Radiotherapy Center.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Introducing and utilizing innovative technologies in health care systems: a country comparison for peripheral drug-eluting stents in Germany and the USA.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- An Evaluation of a Women's Clinic: The Healthcare and Learning Project of the Functional Unit for Women with Schizophrenia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Specialized outpatient care for maternal and child health in PlanificaSUS areas.Revista de saude publica · 2024Article
- With COVID Comes Complexity: Assessing the Implementation of Family Visitation Programs in Long-Term Care.The Gerontologist · 2023Article
- Factors contributing to innovation readiness in health care organizations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Nurse champions as street-level bureaucrats: Factors which facilitate innovation, policy making, and reconstruction.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of radical innovations in secondary healthcare. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A systematic review was conducted and presented in accordance with a PRISMA flowchart. The databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for original publications in English between the 1st of January 2010 and 6th of November 2020. The level of radicalness was determined based on five characteristics of radical innovations. The level of evidence was classified according to the level of evidence scale of the University of Oxford. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used as a framework to classify the barriers and facilitators.
findingsBased on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, nine publications were included, concerning six technological, two organizational and one treatment innovation. The main barriers for radical innovation implementation in secondary healthcare were lack of human, material and financial resources, and lack of integration and organizational readiness. The main facilitators included a supportive culture, sufficient training, education and knowledge, and recognition of the expected added value. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review examining the barriers and facilitators of radical innovation implementation in secondary healthcare. To ease radical innovation implementation, alternative performance systems may be helpful, including the following prerequisites: (1) Money, (2) Added value, (3) Timely knowledge and integration, (4) Culture, and (5) Human resources (MATCH). This study highlights the need for more high-level evidence studies in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.