Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910390›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gynecologic oncology2022

Total mesometrial resection (TMMR) for cervical cancer FIGO IB-IIA: first results from the multicentric TMMR register study.

Paul Buderath, Maciej Stukan, Wencke Ruhwedel, Deivis Strutas, Gabriele Feisel-Schwickardi, Pauline Wimberger, Rainer Kimmig

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01819077 (Register Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01819077 unknown statusnot on this map

Register Study: TMMR and Therapeutic Lymphadenectomy According to M.Hoeckel for Treatment of Cervical Cancer FIGO IB-IIA

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, EssenRan2013 to 2018Enrolled500ConditionsCervical CancerArmsTMMR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Open total mesometrial resection for cervical cancer.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul BuderathDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. paul.buderath@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0941-5635
Maciej StukanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Gdynia Oncology Center, Pomeranian Hospitals, Gdynia, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2376-4663
Wencke RuhwedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6265-0496
Deivis StrutasDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0926-9933
Gabriele Feisel-SchwickardiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1449-2224
Pauline WimbergerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2436-8673
Rainer KimmigDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1118-2199
Essen University Hospital · DEKlinikum Kassel · DELandschaftsverband Westfalen-Lippe · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe surgical concept of total mesometrial resection (TMMR) and therapeutic lymphadenectomy (tLNE) for the treatment of early cervical cancer is based on the ontogenetic cancer field model. Unicentric data show excellent locoregional control rates without adjuvant chemoradiation. However, there are so far no prospective, multicentric data supporting the method.

methodsThe multicentric TMMR register study was designed to answer the question whether the concept of TMMR+tLNE could be transferred to different centers and surgeons without compromising the outstanding oncologic results described in a unicentric setting.

resultsIn 116 patients with cervical cancer stages IB-IIA, (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2018), who underwent TMMR/tLNE, 25.0% were lymph node-positive. pT stages were pT1a in 3 patients (2.6%), pT1b1 in 82 (70.7%), pT1b2 in 18 (15.5%), pT2a in 4 (3.5%) and pT2b in 9 (7.8%). The overall recurrence rate was 7.8% in a median follow-up time of 24 months (6-80). Locoregional recurrences occurred in 6.0% of patients. One patient (0.9%) died from the disease during the observation period.

conclusionThese are the first multicentric data on the surgical concept of TMMR and tLNE for the treatment of cervical cancer FIGO IB-IIA. We were able to reproduce the excellent oncologic data described for the method albeit with a relatively short median observation time. A randomized controlled trial seems warranted to definitely establish TMMR+tLNE as the method of choice for the treatment of early cervical cancer.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01819077.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymph Node ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesCervical CancerLymphadenectomyOperative Surgical ProceduresRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID34910390
PMCPMC8728671
OpenAlexW4200049137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.