Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910290›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022

The Effect of Periocular Negative Pressure Application on Intraocular and Retrobulbar Pressure in Human Cadaver Eyes.

Brian Shafer, Tanner J Ferguson, Nathan Chu, Enrico Brambilla, Paul Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Brian ShaferChester County Eye Care, Malvern, PA, USA.
Tanner J FergusonCole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. tannerferg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7754-0465
Nathan ChuEquinox Ophthalmic, Inc., Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Enrico BrambillaEquinox Ophthalmic, Inc., Newport Beach, CA, USA.
Paul YooEquinox Ophthalmic, Inc., Newport Beach, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo investigate the effect of applying negative pressure (vacuum) to the periocular space on intraocular pressure (IOP) and retrobulbar pressure (RBP) by use of the Multi-Pressure Dial (MPD) system (Equinox Ophthalmic, Inc.).

methodsTwo eyes of two full body cadavers were studied. In each subject, the retrobulbar space, posterior segment and intra-goggle space were cannulated to provide direct IOP, RBP and intra-goggle pressure measurements via a pressure transducer data acquisition system. The goggles of the MPD system were placed over the eyes of each subject, and multiple test runs were performed, with negative pressure settings programmed to 5, 10 and 20 mmHg. IOP and RBP measurements were continuously obtained during each run and plotted against time for analysis.

resultsFor both subjects, the mean reduction (± standard deviation) in IOP was 1.6 ± 0.9 (10%), 3.5 ± 1.8 (23%) and 5.6 ± 2.0 (37%) mmHg at programmed negative pressure levels of - 5, - 10 and - 20 mmHg, respectively. The overall mean change in RBP (mmHg) during negative pressure application was 0.02 ± 0.14 at - 5 mmHg, 0.03 ± 0.19 at - 10 mmHg and - 0.01 ± 0.18 at - 20 mmHg. In both subjects, the magnitude of RBP change during application of negative pressure fell below the uncertainty of the measurement system.

conclusionsThe application of negative pressure to the periocular space with the MPD decreases IOP but does not affect RBP.

Indexed as

CSF pressureMPDMulti-Pressure DialNormal-tension glaucomaOpen-angle glaucomaOrbital pressurePeriocular negative pressureRetrobulbar pressure

Identifiers

PMID34910290
PMCPMC8770790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.