Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910277›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

The hospital of the future: rethinking architectural design to enable new patient-centered treatment concepts.

Carlos Amato, Leslie McCanne, Chengyuan Yang, Daniel Ostler, Osman Ratib, Dirk Wilhelm, Lukas Bernhard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Towards the OR of the future: introducing an adaptive and technology-embracing OR wing layout.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos AmatoCannonDesign, Los Angeles, CA, USA. camato@cannondesign.com.
Leslie McCanneCannonDesign, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Chengyuan YangCannonDesign, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel OstlerResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Osman RatibDepartment of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dirk WilhelmResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Lukas BernhardResearch Group MITI, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9729-8928
TUM Klinikum · DEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeToday's hospitals are designed as collections of individual departments, with limited communication and collaboration between medical sub-specialties. Patients are constantly being moved between different places, which is detrimental for patient experience, overall efficiency and capacity. Instead, we argue that care should be brought to the patient, not vice versa, and thus propose a novel hospital architecture concept that we refer to as Patient Hub. It envisions a truly patient-centered, department-less facility, in which all critical functions occur in the same building and on the same floor.

methodsTo demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of our concept, we selected an exemplary patient scenario and used 3D software to simulate resulting workflows for both the Patient Hub and a traditional hospital based on a generic hospital template by Kaiser-Permanente.

resultsAccording to our workflow simulations, the Patient Hub model effectively eliminates waiting and transfer times, drastically simplifies wayfinding, reduces overall traveling distances by 54%, reduces elevator runs by 78% and improves access to quality views from 67 to 100% for patient rooms, from 0 to 100% for exam rooms and from 0 to 38% for corridors. In addition, the interaction of related medical fields is improved while maintaining the quality of care and the relationship between patients and caregivers.

conclusionWith the Patient Hub concept, we aim at rethinking traditional hospital layouts. We were able to demonstrate, alas on a proof-of-concept basis, that it is indeed feasible to place the patient at the very center of operations, while increasing overall efficiency and capacity at the same time and maintaining the quality of care.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatient-Centered CareHumansClinical workflowHospital of the futurePatient-centered healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34910277
PMCPMC8672652
OpenAlexW4200202420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.