Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910244›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

The effects of vertebral body tethering on sagittal parameters: evaluations from a 2-years follow-up.

Alice Baroncini, Aurelien Courvoisier, Pedro Berjano, Filippo Migliorini, Jörg Eschweiler, Philipp Kobbe, Frank Hildebrand, Per David Trobisch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Sagittal alignment outcomes following two-row vertebral body tethering versus posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter two-year study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radiological Outcomes of Re-tethering for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A 2-to-5-year Follow-Up Case Series After Index Vertebral Body Tethering Failure.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  12. The efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in lenke type 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Bilateral vertebral body tethering: identifying key factors associated with successful outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alice BaronciniDepartment of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany. alice.baroncini@artemed.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4383-3470
Aurelien CourvoisierGrenoble Alpes Scoliosis Center, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Pedro BerjanoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Filippo MiglioriniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Jörg EschweilerDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Philipp KobbeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Frank HildebrandDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Per David TrobischDepartment of Spine Surgery, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEInfineon Technologies (Germany) · DEIstituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile the effects of VBT on coronal parameters have been investigated in various studies, this has not yet been the case for sagittal parameters. This is of particular relevance considering that VBT does not allow direct correction of the sagittal profile. Thus, we investigated the effects of VBT on sagittal parameters in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective, 2-Center study. Patients who underwent VBT and presented a 2-years follow-up were included. The differences in sagittal parameters were evaluated, along with modifications of sagittal profile following Abelin-Genevois' classification.

resultsData from 86 patients were obtained. Mean Cobb angle was 52.4 ± 13.9° at thoracic level and 47.6 ± 14.3° at lumbar level before surgery, and 28.5 ± 13.6 and 26.6 ± 12.7° at the 2-year follow-up, respectively. Mean thoracic kyphosis increased from 28.3 ± 13.8 to 33 ± 13°, the lumbar lordosis (LL) was unvaried (from 47.5 ± 13.1 to 48.4 ± 13.5°), PT decreased from 9.4 ± 8.5 to 7.4 ± 6.1°, the sagittal vertical axis SVA decreased from 4.5 ± 31.4 to - 3.6 ± 27.9 mm. No kyphotic effect on LL in patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation was observed. Before surgery, 39 patients had a type 1 sagittal profile, 18 were type 2a, 14 type 2b and 15 type 3. Postoperatively, 54 were type 1, 8 were 2a, 13 were 2b and 11 were type 3.

conclusionsVBT positively influences sagittal parameters and does not have a kyphotic effect on LL.

Indexed as

KyphosisLordosisScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesThoracic VertebraeVertebral BodyAdolescent idiopathic scoliosisFusionless scoliosis correctionNon-fusion anterior scoliosis correctionSagittal profileVertebral body tethering

Identifiers

PMID34910244
OpenAlexW4200172708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.