Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910182›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Histopathology Is Key to Interpreting Multiplex Molecular Test Results From Postmortem Minimally Invasive Tissue Samples.

Jana M Ritter, Josilene N Seixas, Edwin Walong, Jeanette Dawa, Clayton Onyango, Fabiana C Pimenta, Maria da Gloria Carvalho, Luciana Silva-Flannery, Tiffany Jenkinson, Katie Howard and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [High diagnostic discrepancy in infectious diseases detected by autopsy].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Minimally Invasive Tissue Sampling Surveillance Alliance-Facilitating the Expansion of Pathology-Based Mortality Surveillance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Ancillary and Advanced Techniques for the Postmortem Examination.Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jana M RitterDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Josilene N SeixasDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Edwin WalongCollege of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jeanette DawaCollege of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Clayton OnyangoDivision of Global Health Protection, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya.
Fabiana C PimentaDivision of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maria da Gloria CarvalhoDivision of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Luciana Silva-FlanneryDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tiffany JenkinsonDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Katie HowardDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Julu BhatnagarDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maureen DiazDivision of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jonas M WinchellDivision of Bacterial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sherif R ZakiDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sandra S ChavesInfluenza Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Nairobi, Kenya and Influenza Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Roosecelis B MartinesDivision of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · KEUniversity of Nairobi · KEWashington State Department of Health · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1168515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is an alternative to complete autopsy for determining causes of death. Multiplex molecular testing performed on MITS specimens poses challenges of interpretation, due to high sensitivity and indiscriminate detection of pathogenic, commensal, or contaminating microorganisms.

methodsMITS was performed on 20 deceased children with respiratory illness, at 10 timepoints up to 88 hours postmortem. Samples were evaluated by multiplex molecular testing on fresh tissues by TaqMan® Array Card (TAC) and by histopathology, special stains, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and molecular testing (PCR) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Results were correlated to determine overall pathologic and etiologic diagnoses and to guide interpretation of TAC results.

resultsMITS specimens collected up to 3 days postmortem were adequate for histopathologic evaluation and testing. Seven different etiologic agents were detected by TAC in 10 cases. Three cases had etiologic agents detected by FFPE or other methods and not TAC; 2 were agents not present on TAC, and 2 were streptococci that may have been species other than those present on TAC. Result agreement was 43% for TAC and IHC or PCR, and 69% for IHC and PCR. Extraneous TAC results were common, especially when aspiration was present.

conclusionsTAC can be performed on MITS up to 3 days after death with refrigeration and provides a sensitive method for detection of pathogens but requires careful interpretation in the context of clinicoepidemiologic and histopathologic findings. Interpretation of all diagnostic tests in aggregate to establish overall case diagnoses maximizes the utility of TAC in MITS.

Indexed as

Specimen HandlingAutopsyChildHumansImmunohistochemistryhistopathologyminimally invasive tissue samplingMITSmultiplex PCRTACTaqMan® array card

Identifiers

PMID34910182
PMCPMC8672755
OpenAlexW4200031285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.