Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910151›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2021

Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Fall Prevention and Management for Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Manuel M Montero-Odasso, Nellie Kamkar, Frederico Pieruccini-Faria, Abdelhady Osman, Yanina Sarquis-Adamson, Jacqueline Close, David B Hogan, Susan Winifred Hunter, Rose Anne Kenny, Lewis A Lipsitz and 11 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 177 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06345118 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluate the Results of Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Geriatric HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fall, Elderly PatientArmsOtago exercise program
NCT06961812 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Validation of the Self-Assessment for Falls in the Elderly (SAFE) Questionnaire to Assess the Risk of Falls in People Aged 60 or Over.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsFall Prevention, Falls (Accidents) in Old AgeArmsQuestionnaire and Physical Exam, Safe Self-Administered Questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diminishing returns of fall reduction for hip fracture prevention in older age.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Strategies to Minimize Fall-related Injuries in Older Adults at Risk of Falls: The Falling Safely Training Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Manuel M Montero-OdassoSchulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Nellie KamkarGait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Frederico Pieruccini-FariaGait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abdelhady OsmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Yanina Sarquis-AdamsonGait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline CloseFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
David B HoganDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Susan Winifred HunterFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rose Anne KennyDepartment of Medical Gerontology, Mercers Institute for Ageing, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Lewis A LipsitzHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stephen R LordFalls, Balance and Injury Research Centre, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kenneth M MaddenDivision of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mirko PetrovicSection of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jesper RygDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mark SpeechleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Munira SultanaGait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Maw Pin TanCentre for Innovation in Medical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
N van der VeldeSection of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Joe VergheseInstitute for Aging Research, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Tahir MasudDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Task Force on Global Guidelines for Falls in Older Adults

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: With the global population aging, falls and fall-related injuries are ubiquitous, and several clinical practice guidelines for falls prevention and management for individuals 60 years or older have been developed. A systematic evaluation of the recommendations and agreement level is lacking. Objectives: To perform a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for falls prevention and management for adults 60 years or older in all settings (eg, community, acute care, and nursing homes), evaluate agreement in recommendations, and identify potential gaps. Evidence Review: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement methods for clinical practice guidelines on fall prevention and management for older adults was conducted (updated July 1, 2021) using MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, PEDro, and Epistemonikos databases. Medical Subject Headings search terms were related to falls, clinical practice guidelines, management and prevention, and older adults, with no restrictions on date, language, or setting for inclusion. Three independent reviewers selected records for full-text examination if they followed evidence- and consensus-based processes and assessed the quality of the guidelines using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE-II) criteria. The strength of the recommendations was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scores, and agreement across topic areas was assessed using the Fleiss κ statistic. Findings: Of 11 414 records identified, 159 were fully reviewed and assessed for eligibility, and 15 were included. All 15 selected guidelines had high-quality AGREE-II total scores (mean [SD], 80.1% [5.6%]), although individual quality domain scores for clinical applicability (mean [SD], 63.4% [11.4%]) and stakeholder (clinicians, patients, or caregivers) involvement (mean [SD], 76.3% [9.0%]) were lower. A total of 198 recommendations covering 16 topic areas in 15 guidelines were identified after screening 4767 abstracts that proceeded to 159 full texts. Most (≥11) guidelines strongly recommended performing risk stratification, assessment tests for gait and balance, fracture and osteoporosis management, multifactorial interventions, medication review, exercise promotion, environment modification, vision and footwear correction, referral to physiotherapy, and cardiovascular interventions. The strengths of the recommendations were inconsistent for vitamin D supplementation, addressing cognitive factors, and falls prevention education. Recommendations on use of hip protectors and digital technology or wearables were often missing. None of the examined guidelines included a patient or caregiver panel in their deliberations. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review found that current clinical practice guidelines on fall prevention and management for older adults showed a high degree of agreement in several areas in which strong recommendations were made, whereas other topic areas did not achieve this level of consensus or coverage. Future guidelines should address clinical applicability of their recommendations and include perspectives of patients and other stakeholders.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyConsensusEnvironment DesignHealth PromotionHealth Services for the AgedHumansMedication ReviewMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPractice Guidelines as TopicWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID34910151
PMCPMC8674747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.