Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34910026›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2021

Effect of the coverage of rapid tests for syphilis in primary care on the syphilis in pregnancy in Brazil.

Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, Tatyana Maria Silva de Souza Rosendo, Marquiony Marques Dos Santos, Ana Karla Bezerra Lopes, Kenio Costa de Lima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Dual Test in Pregnant Women: Case of a General Zone Hospital with Family Medicine].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angelo Giuseppe RoncalliUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Centro de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Natal, RN, Brasils.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-697X
Tatyana Maria Silva de Souza RosendoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Centro de Ciências da Saúde. Departamento de Saúde Coletiva. Natal, RN, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-3119
Marquiony Marques Dos SantosUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Laboratório de Inovação Tecnológica em Saúde. Natal, RN, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5812-4004
Ana Karla Bezerra LopesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde. Natal, RN, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-7498
Kenio Costa de LimaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Centro de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Natal, RN, Brasils.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5668-4398
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the effect of rapid tests coverage in Primary Care on syphilis detection rate in pregnant women in Brazil, in municipalities with more than 100,000 inhabitants.

methodsThe dependent variable was the syphilis detection rate in pregnant women between 2012 and 2018. As the main independent variables, the methods for measuring the coverage of rapid tests for syphilis in Primary Care were used and, as adjustment variables, some indicators of health services and socioeconomic. We opted for a linear regression model for panel data (panel data analysis), considering the municipality as the unit of analysis and the year as the time variable.

resultsFrom the results of the final model, we can infer that, for a given municipality, as the rate of rapid tests increases by one point for every thousand live births, the detection rate of syphilis in pregnant women increases by an average of 0.02 cases per thousand live births (p < 0.001). This value is adjusted for Family Health coverage, proportion of health facilities per inhabitant, per capita expenditure on health and the Human Development Index.

conclusionsThere was a substantial improvement in the amount of rapid tests available, as well as a significant increase in the number of tests performed in pregnant women, which predicts an increase in syphilis rates in pregnant women. However, a worrying hypothesis is that the number of tests performed on pregnant women during the analyzed period may have been insufficient to detect the progress of the epidemic in this population.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousSyphilisSyphilis, CongenitalBrazilFemaleHumansLive BirthPregnancyPrenatal CarePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID34910026
PMCPMC8621623
OpenAlexW3216752445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.