Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909754›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022

"

Josephine M Wildman, Stephanie Morris, Tessa Pollard, Kate Gibson, Suzanne Moffatt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Implementation and impact of a social prescribing intervention: an ethnographic exploration.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Dual Pandemics of COVID-19 and Obesity: Bidirectional Impact.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Josephine M WildmanPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Ridley 1 Building, 5th Floor, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom.
Stephanie MorrisDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Tessa PollardDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Kate GibsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Ridley 1 Building, 5th Floor, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom.
Suzanne MoffattPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Ridley 1 Building, 5th Floor, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GBDurham University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The co-occurrence of COVID-19, non-communicable diseases and socioeconomic disadvantage has been identified as creating a syndemic: a state of synergistic epidemics, occurring when co-occurring health conditions interact with social conditions to amplify the burden of disease. In this study, we use the concept of illness management work to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of people living with, often multiple, chronic health conditions in a range of social circumstances. In-depth interviews were conducted between May and July 2020 with 29 participants living in a city in North East England. Qualitative data provide unique insights for those seeking to better understand the consequences for human life and wellbeing of the interacting social, physical and psychological factors that create syndemic risks in people's lives. Among this group of people at increased vulnerability to harm from COVID-19, we find that the pandemic public health response increased the work required for condition management. Mental distress was amplified by fear of infection and by the requirements of social isolation and distancing that removed participants' usual sources of support. Social conditions, such as poor housing, low incomes and the requirement to earn a living, further amplified the work of managing everyday life and risked worsening existing mental ill health. As evidenced by the experiences reported here, the era of pandemics will require a renewed focus on the connection between health and social justice if stubborn, and worsening health and social inequalities are to be addressed or, at the very least, not increased.

Indexed as

COVID-19Illness workMultimorbidityNon-communicable diseasesSocial determinants of healthSyndemic

Identifiers

PMID34909754
PMCPMC8654704
OpenAlexW4200031515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.