Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909742›Full record

ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2021

Evidence-Based Consensus Recommendations for the Evolving Treatment of Patients with High-Risk and Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Guilherme Rabinowits, Michael R Migden, Todd E Schlesinger, Robert L Ferris, Morganna Freeman, Valerie Guild, Shlomo Koyfman, Anna C Pavlick, Neil Swanson, Gregory T Wolf and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cosibelimab: A Novel Therapeutic for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Managing Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Guide for the Dermatology Clinician.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Guilherme RabinowitsDivision of Hematology Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute/Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.
Michael R MigdenDepartment of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Todd E SchlesingerDermatology & Laser Center of Charleston, Summerville, South Carolina, USA.
Robert L FerrisDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Morganna FreemanCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.
Valerie GuildAIM at Melanoma Foundation, Plano, Texas, USA.
Shlomo KoyfmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Anna C PavlickSandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Neil SwansonOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Gregory T WolfDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Scott M DinehartArkansas Dermatology & Skin Cancer Center, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
AIM at Melanoma Foundation · USArkansas Cardiology · USBaptist Hospital of Miami · USCity of Hope · USCleveland Clinic · USCornell University · USDermatology Surgery & Laser Center · USMichigan Medicine · USOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the second most common skin cancer in the United States. Currently, there is no standardized management approach for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma who develop metastatic or locally advanced disease and are not candidates for curative surgery or curative radiation. To address this issue, the Expert Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Leadership program convened an expert steering committee to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations on the basis of a large, structured literature review. Consensus was achieved through modified Delphi methodology. The steering committee included five dermatologists, three medical oncologists, two head and neck surgeons, one radiation oncologist, and a patient advocacy group representative. The steering committee aligned on the following clinical topics: diagnosis and identification of patients considered not candidates for surgery; staging systems and risk stratification in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; the role of radiation therapy, surgery, and systemic therapy in the management of advanced disease, with a focus on immunotherapy; referral patterns; survivorship care; and inclusion of the patient's perspective. Consensus was achieved on 34 recommendations addressing 12 key clinical questions. The Expert Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Leadership steering committee's evidence-based consensus recommendations may provide healthcare professionals with practically oriented guidance to help optimize outcomes for patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

cSCC, cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaEXCeL, Expert Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Leadership

Identifiers

PMID34909742
PMCPMC8659794
OpenAlexW3194196194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.