Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909607›Full record

ReviewPeople and nature (Hoboken, N.J.)2021

Envisioning a resilient future for biodiversity conservation in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Ruth H Thurstan, Kimberley J Hockings, Johanna S U Hedlund, Elena Bersacola, Claire Collins, Regan Early, Yunsiska Ermiasi, Frauke Fleischer-Dogley, Gabriella Gilkes, Mark E Harrison and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in People and nature (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Ruth H ThurstanCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8045-1631
Kimberley J HockingsCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-644X
Johanna S U HedlundCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5826-9588
Elena BersacolaCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-8687
Claire CollinsCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-7219
Regan EarlyCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4108-5904
Yunsiska ErmiasiYayasan Borneo Nature Indonesia Central Kalimantan Palangka Raya Indonesia.
Frauke Fleischer-DogleySeychelles Islands Foundation Victoria Republic of Seychelles.
Gabriella GilkesEden Project International Ltd Cornwall UK.
Mark E HarrisonCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0729-8407
Muhammad Ali ImronFaculty of Forestry Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2371-7795
Christopher N Kaiser-BunburyCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-3491
Daniel Refly KatoppoYayasan Borneo Nature Indonesia Central Kalimantan Palangka Raya Indonesia.
Cheryl MarriottCornwall Wildlife Trust Allet UK.
Marie-May MuzungaileBiodiversity Conservation and Management Division Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change Victoria Republic of Seychelles.
Ana NunoCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4680-2378
Aissa Regalla de BarrosInstituto da Biodiversidade e das Áreas Protegidas Dr. Alfredo Simão da Silva (IBAP) Bissau Guiné-Bissau.
Frank van VeenCentre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0708-5492
Isuru WijesundaraOceanswell Colombo 5 Sri Lanka.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-458X
Didier DogleyInspire for Tomorrow Consultancy Mahé Seychelles.
Nancy BunburySeychelles Islands Foundation Victoria Republic of Seychelles.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5836-5497
University of Exeter · GBBorneo Orangutan Survival Foundation · IDUniversity of Seychelles · SCEden Project · GBLund University · SEUniversitas Gadjah Mada · IDUniversity of Leicester · GBVincent Wildlife Trust · GBZoological Society of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect societies across the world, the ongoing economic and social disruptions are likely to present fundamental challenges for current and future biodiversity conservation.We review the literature for outcomes of past major societal, political, economic and zoonotic perturbations on biodiversity conservation, and demonstrate the complex implications of perturbation events upon conservation efforts. Building on the review findings, we use six in-depth case studies and the emerging literature to identify positive and negative outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic, known and anticipated, for biodiversity conservation efforts around the world.A number of similarities exist between the current pandemic and past perturbations, with experiences highlighting that the pandemic-induced declines in conservation revenue and capacity, livelihood and trade disruptions are likely to have long-lasting and negative implications for biodiversity and conservation efforts.Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic also brought about a global pause in human movement that is unique in recent history, and may yet foster long-lasting behavioural and societal changes, presenting opportunities to strengthen and advance conservation efforts in the wake of the pandemic. Enhanced collaborations and partnerships at the local level, cross-sectoral engagement, local investment and leadership will all enhance the resilience of conservation efforts in the face of future perturbations. Other actions aimed at enhancing resilience will require fundamental institutional change and extensive government and public engagement and support if they are to be realised.The pandemic has highlighted the inherent vulnerabilities in the social and economic models upon which many conservation efforts are based. In so doing, it presents an opportunity to reconsider the status quo for conservation, and promotes behaviours and actions that are resilient to future perturbation. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Indexed as

coronavirushuman–wildlife interactionsSARS‐CoV‐2shockssocial–ecological systemssustainabilitytourismzoonotic transmission

Identifiers

PMID34909607
PMCPMC8661774
OpenAlexW3204319281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.