Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909590›Full record

ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2021

Is physical examination as effective as magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected pediatric scaphoid fractures?

Fevzi Saglam, Ozgur Baysal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fevzi SaglamDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey.
Ozgur BaysalDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether careful physical examination is as effective in diagnosis as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with suspected scaphoid fractures and whether radiography is sufficient in the follow-up of these patients.

methodsThis prospective study included patients with tenderness of the anatomic snuffbox on physical examination and no fracture on radiography between 2015 and 2019, and the data were evaluated retrospectively. A short-arm thumb spica casting was applied for an initial diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fracture. MRI was performed within 1 week after initial trauma. Physical examination and X-rays at 2-week intervals were applied during the follow-up period. The functional outcomes were evaluated using the Modified Mayo Wrist score.

resultsA total of 92 patients (28 girls and 64 boys; mean age: 12.32±2.22 years) were diagnosed with suspected scaphoid fracture on physical examination and MRI was performed. The MRI confirmed the suspected scaphoid fracture at the rate of 77.2% (n=71). The sensitivity obtained for the radiograph was 14.08%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 25.61%. The mean Modified Mayo Wrist score was 92.43±2.64 (range, 85-98).

conclusionDetection of tenderness on the anatomic snuffbox without determination of fracture radiographically should be evaluated and treated in favor of a scaphoid fracture. These fractures are mostly treated successfully with conservative treatment.

Indexed as

Pediatric scaphoid fracturescaphoid magnetic resonance imagingwrist examination

Identifiers

PMID34909590
PMCPMC8630713
OpenAlexW3169552688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.