Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909381›Full record

ArticleGynecology and minimally invasive therapy

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Urodynamic Changes Using Single-incision Slings (MiniArc

Fook Chin Chiang, Ryan Sun, Yu-Jun Chang, Yi-Ing Li, Mou-Jong Sun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecology and minimally invasive therapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fook Chin ChiangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ryan SunDepartment of Surgery, Section of Urology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Yu-Jun ChangEpidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Yi-Ing LiCenter for Urinary Incontinence and Voiding Dysfunction, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
Mou-Jong SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taichung, Taiwan.
Changhua Christian Hospital · TWCheng Ching Hospital · TWUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy and urodynamic parameter changes between the MiniArc and the Solyx sling for the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence (USI). MATERIALS AND

methodsOne-hundred and thirty (MiniArc

resultsAll Solyx users, as opposed to 91.1% of MiniArc patients, obtained objective cure at postoperative 3 months (

conclusionSingle-incision mini-slings are safe and effective treatment for female USI. The Solyx SIS demonstrated superiority over the MiniArc in this study based on its higher objective cure rate and lower risk for surgical failure.

Indexed as

EfficacyMiniArcsingle incision slingssolyxstress incontinenceurodynamic changes

Identifiers

PMID34909381
PMCPMC8613486
OpenAlexW3213416452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.