Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909241›Full record

ArticleWorld medical & health policy2021

Face coverings during the pandemic?

Rachael M Moyer, Geoboo Song, Natalie Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World medical & health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Face coverings during the pandemic?World medical & health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachael M MoyerDepartment of Political Science, J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Science The University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8321-9128
Geoboo SongDepartment of Political Science, J. William Fulbright College of Arts and Science The University of Arkansas Fayetteville Arkansas USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6083-8137
Natalie JacksonPublic Religion Research Institute (PRRI) Washington District of Columbia USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Health Belief Model (HBM), a value-expectancy model, is a leading framework in health behavior and communication research. The model is intended to inform targeted communication strategies that promote positive health behaviors. Individual beliefs associated with health risks such as perceived susceptibility and perceived severity are often incorporated into HBM as predictors of health behavior. However, recent studies point to limitations of the current model. At the same time, researchers have successfully used Cultural Theory (CT) to conceptualize, measure, and predict the cultural influences on health risk management. This study applies OLS regression and graphical analysis to examine the relationship between more intrinsic cultural value-based beliefs and HBM beliefs so as to understand behavioral intentions associated with COVID-19 among the general public in the United States while statistically controlling for the effects of partisanship and demographic factors.

Identifiers

PMID34909241
PMCPMC8662041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.