Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909224›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2021

Higher rates of surgical and medical complications and mortality following TKA in patients aged ≥ 80 years: a systematic review of comparative studies.

Olivier Courage, Louise Strom, Floris van Rooij, Matthieu Lalevée, Donatien Heuzé, Pierre Emanuel Papin, Michael Butnaru, Jacobus Hendrik Müller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Optimal inputs for machine learning models in predicting total joint arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olivier CourageRamsay Santé, Hopital Prive de l'Estuaire, LeHavre, France.
Louise StromReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.
Floris van RooijReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.
Matthieu LalevéeRamsay Santé, Hopital Prive de l'Estuaire, LeHavre, France.
Donatien HeuzéRamsay Santé, Hopital Prive de l'Estuaire, LeHavre, France.
Pierre Emanuel PapinRamsay Santé, Hopital Prive de l'Estuaire, LeHavre, France.
Michael ButnaruRamsay Santé, Hopital Prive de l'Estuaire, LeHavre, France.
Jacobus Hendrik MüllerReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize studies published since the last systematic review in 2015 that compare outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in older patients (≥ 80 years) and in younger patients (< 80 years), in terms of complication rates and mortality.An electronic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane Register. Studies were included if they compared outcomes of primary TKA for osteoarthritis in patients aged 80 years and over to patients aged under 80 years, in terms of complication rates, mortality, or patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Thirteen studies were eligible. Surgical complications in older patients ranged from 0.6-21.1%, while in younger patients they ranged from 0.3-14.6%. Wound complications in older patients ranged from 0.5-20%, while in younger patients they ranged from 0.8-22.0%. Medical complications (cardiac, respiratory, thromboembolic) in older patients ranged from 0.4-17.3%, while in younger patients they ranged from 0.2-11.5%.Mortality within 90 days in older patients ranged between 0-2%, while in younger patients it ranged between 0.0-0.03%.Compared to younger patients, older patients have higher rates of surgical and medical complications, as well as higher mortality following TKA. The literature also reports greater length of stay for older patients, but inconsistent findings regarding PROs. The present findings provide surgeons and older patients with clearer updated evidence, to make informed decisions regarding TKA, considering the risks and benefits within this age group. Patients aged over 80 years should therefore not be excluded from consideration for primary TKA based on age alone. Cite this article:

Indexed as

elderlygeriatriclength of staymortalitynonagenarianoctogenarianoutcomesTKAtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID34909224
PMCPMC8631241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.