Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909199›Full record

ReviewMolecular and clinical oncology2022

Cost-effectiveness of precision cancer medicine-current challenges in the use of next generation sequencing for comprehensive tumour genomic profiling and the role of clinical utility frameworks (Review).

Konstantinos Christofyllakis, Joerg Thomas Bittenbring, Lorenz Thurner, Manfred Ahlgrimm, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Moritz Bewarder, Dominic Kaddu-Mulindwa

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Precision medicine in breast cancer (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Personalized medicine in oncology].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. The Future of Interventions for Stage IV Colorectal Cancers.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  19. [Precision medicine in oncology].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  20. Molecular diagnostics tailoring personalized cancer therapy-an oncologist's view.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Konstantinos ChristofyllakisDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Joerg Thomas BittenbringDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Lorenz ThurnerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Manfred AhlgrimmDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Stephan StilgenbauerDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Moritz BewarderDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Dominic Kaddu-MulindwaDepartment of Hematology, Oncology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Saarland University Medical Center, D-66421 Homburg, Germany.
Saarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision cancer medicine (PCM) is an emerging paradigm in oncology, which includes tumour comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) to enable molecularly guided therapy. However, cost-effectiveness analyses of PCM are faced with several challenges and, thus, its cost-effectiveness remains unclear. Early trials using only molecularly guided therapy were faced with the challenge of providing adequate measures of outcome, which probably explains the modest treatment benefits demonstrated. Endpoints like the progression-free survival (PFS)2/PFS1 ratio may assist in overcoming this issue. Moreover, specific tumour subtypes appear to benefit more from PCM. Costs associated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) for CGP are decreasing, but targeted therapy itself represents a major cost driver. CGP not only enables prediction of response to treatment, but also resistance, and could thus prevent administration of unnecessary (and costly) therapies. In clinical practice, the presence of clinical frameworks, such as the Recommendations for the Use of NGS for Patients with Metastatic Cancers from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group, and the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets, are essential in appropriately identifying situations where PCM is clinically meaningful, thereby improving its cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

comprehensive genomic profilingcost effectivenessnext generation sequencingprecision cancer medicinetargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID34909199
PMCPMC8655747
OpenAlexW3216280330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.