Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34909128›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2021

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance of cardiac tumors and masses.

Marco Gatti, Tommaso D'Angelo, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Serena Dell'aversana, Alessandro Andreis, Andrea Carisio, Fatemeh Darvizeh, Davide Tore, Gianluca Pontone, Riccardo Faletti

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Arrhythmic risk in ventricular cardiac tumors: A comparative imaging and clinical analysis.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco GattiRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy. marcogatti17@gmail.com.
Tommaso D'AngeloDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, "G. Martino" University Hospital Messina, Messina 98100, Italy.
Giuseppe MuscogiuriDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, San Luca Hospital, Milan 20149, Italy.
Serena Dell'aversanaDepartment of Radiology, S. Maria Delle Grazie Hospital, Pozzuoli 80078, Italy.
Alessandro AndreisDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy.
Andrea CarisioRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy.
Fatemeh DarvizehSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20121, Italy.
Davide ToreRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy.
Gianluca PontoneDepartment of Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan 20138, Italy.
Riccardo FalettiRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac masses diagnosis and treatment are a true challenge, although they are infrequently encountered in clinical practice. They encompass a broad set of lesions that include neoplastic (primary and secondary), non-neoplastic masses and pseudomasses. The clinical presentation of cardiac tumors is highly variable and depends on several factors such as size, location, relation with other structures and mobility. The presumptive diagnosis is made based on a preliminary non-invasive diagnostic work-up due to technical difficulties and risks associated with biopsy, which is still the diagnostic gold standard. The findings should always be interpreted in the clinical context to avoid misdiagnosis, particularly in specific conditions (

Indexed as

Cine magnetic resonance imagingEarly gadolinium enhancementHeart neoplasmLate-gadolinium enhancementMultimodal imagingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34909128
PMCPMC8641001
OpenAlexW3216349509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.