ReviewWorld journal of cardiology2021
Cardiac monitoring for patients with palpitations.
Review in World journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Prospective Real-World Study Evaluating the Feasibility and Diagnostic Yield of Patient-Recorded Smartwatch EKGs During Palpitations: The WATCHinTIME Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Micronutrient Profiles and Anxiety in Adolescents with Non-Structural Palpitations: A Case-Control Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Palpitations: A Practical Approach.Cureus · 2025Review
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Their Management: An In-Depth Review of Current Practices and Emerging Therapies.Cureus · 2024Review
- Wearable Patch ECG monitors and transesophageal electrophysiological study for diagnosing palpitations of unknown origin.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Tachyarrhythmias in congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management.World journal of cardiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Palpitations are one of the most common reasons for medical consultation. They tend to worry patients and can affect their quality of life. They are often a symptom associated with cardiac rhythm disorders, although there are other etiologies. For diagnosis, it is essential to be able to reliably correlate the symptoms with an electrocardiographic record allowing the identification or ruling out of a possible rhythm disorder. However, reaching a diagnosis is not always simple, given that they tend to be transitory symptoms and the patient is frequently asymptomatic at the time of assessment. In recent years, electrocardiographic monitoring systems have incorporated many technical improvements that solve several of the 24-h Holter monitor limitations. The objective of this review is to provide an update on the different monitoring methods currently available, remarking their indications and limitations, to help healthcare professionals to appropriately select and use them in the work-up of patients with palpitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.