Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908998›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2020

The Impact of Anodal tDCS on the Attentional Networks as a Function of Trait Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms: A Preregistered Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Experiment.

Charlotte Coussement, Monica Riesco de Vega, Alexandre Heeren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlotte CoussementPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4549-9904
Monica Riesco de VegaDepartment of Sport Science, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7222-1660
Alexandre HeerenPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-6149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAttention is a multifaceted construct, including three distinct attentional networks: the alerting, orienting, and executive conflict networks. Recently, researchers have started to envision strategies to enhance the attentional networks, and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising tool to do so, especially regarding the executive conflict network. On the other hand, other research lines have suggested that anodal tDCS might yield more substantial impacts among depressive and anxious participants.

methodIn this preregistered study, we thus examined two questions. First, we wanted to replicate previous observations and tested whether anodal tDCS does improve the executive conflict network's efficiency. Second, we set out to clarify the impact of anxiety and depressive symptoms on this effect. To do so, we adopted a double-blind within-subject protocol in an unselected sample ( RESULTS AND

conclusionsAlthough there were no significant direct effects of tDCS on the attentional networks, we found that the higher the levels of depression and trait anxiety, the larger the executive conflict network's enhancement during tDCS. By highlighting the importance of trait anxiety and depression when considering the impact of tDCS on the attentional networks, this study fulfills a valuable niche in clinical neuroscience, wherein preclinical data provide critical clues for larger, more definitive future translational efforts.

Indexed as

attentional networksdepressionexecutive controlneuromodulationpreclinical researchtrait anxietytranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34908998
PMCPMC8629077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.