Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908995›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2020

Decision-Making, Impulsiveness and Temperamental Traits in Eating Disorders.

Agnese Ciberti, Matteo Cavalletti, Laura Palagini, Michela Giorgi Mariani, Liliana Dell'Osso, Mauro Mauri, Alessandra Maglio, Federico Mucci, Donatella Marazziti, Mario Miniati

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agnese CibertiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Matteo CavallettiCognitive Psychotherapy Clinical Centre, Florence, Italy.
Laura PalaginiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Michela Giorgi MarianiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Liliana Dell'OssoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Mauro MauriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra MaglioDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Federico MucciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Donatella MarazzitiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Mario MiniatiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore decision-making, impulsiveness and temperamental traits in patients suffering from eating disorders (EDs), as compared with healthy controls (HC).

methodFifty-one patients affected by ED (fourteen with anorexia restricting subtype, AN-R; fourteen with bulimia, BN; thirteen with anorexia bingeing/purging subtype, AN-BP; ten with binge-eating disorder, BED) and twenty-eight HC. The patients, recruited at the Section of Psychiatry of the University of Pisa (Italy, were evaluated with a battery of neuropsychological questionnaires, including the IOWA Gambling Task (IGT), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).

resultsThe results indicated that AN-R, AN-BP and BN patients showed poorer IGT performances than HC (p < .05), while BED performances were similar to those of HC. IGT scores suggested the existence of similarities in decision-making performances of AN-BP and BN patients, as they performed differently from HC starting from block 3 (F(16.2)=1.7). In addition, differences between AN-BP/BN and AN-R patients were detected, given that they performed differently starting from block 4. As far as BIS-11 is concerned, AN-BP and BN patients reached the highest BIS total scores, when compared with the other groups. Further, they shared similar temperamental and impulsiveness profiles, as demonstrated by their BIS-11 'motor impulsiveness' scores, and by their TCI 'novelty seeking', 'reward dependence' and 'persistence' dimensions. The post-hoc analyses revealed that both AN groups (namely, AN-R and AN-BP) scored significantly lower than HC on the FAB. No patients fulfilled the criteria for the diagnosis of a current major depression.

conclusionsDecision-making deficits are common in EDs. In AN-R these seem related to cognitive styles, while in AN-BP and BN patients with temperament features and impulsiveness traits.

Indexed as

decision-makingeating disorderseating-disorders spectrumfrontal lobe functioningimpulsivenesstemperament

Identifiers

PMID34908995
PMCPMC8629064
OpenAlexW4205229973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.