Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908941›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2019

Emotional Blunting, Cognitive Impairment, Bone Fractures, and Bleeding as Possible Side Effects of Long-Term Use of SSRIs.

Donatella Marazziti, Federico Mucci, Beniamino Tripodi, Manuel Glauco Carbone, Alessia Muscarella, Valentina Falaschi, Stefano Baroni

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Chronic escitalopram in healthy volunteers has specific effects on reinforcement sensitivity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled semi-randomised study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparable roles for serotonin in rats and humans for computations underlying flexible decision-making.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Donatella MarazzitiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Federico MucciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Beniamino TripodiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Manuel Glauco CarboneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Alessia MuscarellaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Valentina FalaschiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
Stefano BaroniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSelective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are amongst the most prescribed drugs worldwide not only for psychiatric conditions, but also for medical purposes. Converging data gathered throughout the decades following their development would indicate that SSRIs have a broader side effect profile than previously assumed. Therefore, the aim of the present paper was to to review available literature highlighting less common side effects emerging with their long-term use.

methodThis systematic review, carried out according to PRISMA guidelines, was performed through searching electronic databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus. The keyword used was "SSRIs" combined with the following: "Side effects", or "Emotional blunting or flattening", or "Cognition", or "Neuroimaging", or "Bone", "or "Platelet aggregation", or "Bleeding".

resultsThe most common side effects, besides the classical ones described in the literature are represented by decreased emotional response to both adversive and pleasurable events, some cognitive impairments, bone fractures and prolonged overall bleeding time.

conclusionsAfter analyzing critically the available findings, it should be noted that only the so-called "emotional blunting" is supported by converging data, while results on cognitive impairment are extremely controversial, given some evidence showing that SSRIs may improve cognition. Similarly, no agreement exists on the detrimental effects of SSRIs on bone metabolism and coagulation.Large, prospective and long-term studies are needed to clarify the possible impact of SSRIs on emotions, cognitive functions, bone fractures and coagulation, as well to detect other possible still neglected side effects.

Indexed as

antidepressantsbone metabolismchronic usecoagulationcognitionemotional bluntingneuroimagingselective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsside effects

Identifiers

PMID34908941
PMCPMC8650205
OpenAlexW4206854864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.