ArticleIEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium
Calibration Methodology of an Edgeless PET System Prototype.
Article in IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium conference record. Nuclear Science Symposium. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D in-system calibration method for PET detectors.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Instrumentation research in small animal Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging is driven by improving timing, spatial resolution and sensitivity. Conventional PET scanners are built of multiple detectors placed in a cylindrical geometry with gaps between them in both the transaxial and axial planes. These gaps decrease sensitivity and degrade spatial resolution towards the edges of the system field of view (FOV). To mitigate these problems, we have designed and validated an edgeless pre-clinical PET system based on a single LYSO annulus with an inner diameter of 62 mm and 10 outer facets of 26 × 52 mm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.