Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908769›Full record

ArticleJournal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery

Hair Transplant Practice Guidelines.

Venkatram Mysore, Muthuvel Kumaresan, Anil Garg, Aman Dua, Aniketh Venkatram, Kapil Dua, Mayank Singh, C Madura, Ram Chandran, Rajendra Singh Rajput and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combination and Rotational Therapy in Androgenetic Alopecia.Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Venkatram MysoreThe Venkat Center for Skin and Plastic Surgery, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Muthuvel KumaresanCutis Skin Clinic & Hair Transplant Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anil GargRejuvenate Hair Transplant Center, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Aman DuaAK Clinics & Hair Transplant Center, Delhi, India.
Aniketh VenkatramCutis Skin Clinic & Hair Transplant Center, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kapil DuaAK Clinics & Hair Transplant Center, Delhi, India.
Mayank SinghRadiance Cosmetic Center, Delhi, India.
C MaduraCutis Academy of Cutaneous Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Ram ChandranApollo Speciality Center, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rajendra Singh RajputRajesh Rajput Clinic, Mumbai, India.
Sandeep SatturHair Revive Center, Mumbai, India.
Sukhbir SinghResplendent Cosmetic Studio, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of hair transplant (HT) has grown exponentially in the past decade, especially after the introduction of follicular unit excision (FUE). There is much variation in criteria for case selection, the technique, pre- and post-procedure protocols, by different surgeons. Techniques continue to evolve and evidence in the form of controlled data is not available for all techniques and protocols being used; there is also a debate as to who can do what, what should be the training for staff, role of technicians. This has led to a situation wherein medico legal issues have cropped up as to what is minimum acceptable. An attempt is made to summarize standard protocols with the available evidence. It is emphasized that the objective of these guidelines is to recommend minimum standards for practice of hair transplantation. The principles outlined in these guidelines are of a general nature only, minimal in their level and are not meant to cover all situations. It should be understood that these recommendations are by no means binding and universal, represent minimum standards only and as in all surgical techniques, variations in techniques are possible. It is also further clarified that these are based on current literature, and as science evolves, these guidelines could also change in future. Where published evidence is not available, consensus expert opinion is presented. The task force emphasizes that each patient has to be treated on his/her own merit and that these guidelines do not limit the physician from making an appropriate choice or the necessary innovation for a given patient. The task force recognizes that the treating surgeon is best suited to decide what is needed for a given patient in a given situation. Innovations in medicine need flexibility in approach and these guidelines do not limit the surgeon from undertaking innovative research.

Indexed as

Guidelineshair transplantsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34908769
PMCPMC8611706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.