Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908607›Full record

ArticleSocial science quarterly2021

Ideology and compliance with health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative perspective.

Michael Becher, Daniel Stegmueller, Sylvain Brouard, Eric Kerrouche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Politics of Covid-19 Containment Policies in europe.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael BecherInstitute for Advanced Study in Toulouse and IE School of Global and Public Affairs Madrid Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0570-3499
Daniel StegmuellerDepartment of Political Science Duke University Durham North Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-1253
Sylvain BrouardCenter for Political Research (CEVIPOF) Sciences Po Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5652-8715
Eric KerroucheCenter for Political Research (CEVIPOF) Sciences Po Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-0901

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe measure the prevalence of noncompliance with public health guidelines in the COVID-19 pandemic and examine how it is shaped by political ideology across countries.

methodsA list experiment of noncompliance and a multi-item scale of health-related behaviors were embedded in a comparative survey of 11,000 respondents in nine OCED countries. We conduct a statistical analysis of the list experiment capturing degrees of noncompliance with social distancing rules and estimate ideological effect heterogeneity. A semiparametric analysis examines the functional form of the relationship between ideology and the propensity to violate public health guidelines.

resultsOur analyses reveal substantial heterogeneity between countries. Ideology plays an outsized role in the United States. No association of comparable magnitude is found in the majority of the other countries in our study. In many settings, the impact of ideology on health-related behaviors is nonlinear.

conclusionOur results highlight the importance of taking a comparative perspective. Extrapolating the role of ideology from the United States to other advanced industrialized societies might paint an erroneous picture of the scope of possible nonpharmaceutical interventions. Heterogeneity limits the extent to which policymakers can learn from experiences across borders.

Identifiers

PMID34908607
PMCPMC8661825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.