Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908431›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2021

Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.

Angie Mordant, Manuel Kleiner

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Angie MordantDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0151-4498
Manuel KleinerDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6904-0287
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Metaproteomics to investigate intestinal microbiota-host and -diet interactionsR35GM138362 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI KLEINER, MANUEL · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical step in studies of the intestinal microbiome using meta-omics approaches is the preservation of samples before analysis. Preservation is essential for approaches that measure gene expression, such as metaproteomics, which is used to identify and quantify proteins in microbiomes. Intestinal microbiome samples are typically stored by flash-freezing and storage at -80°C, but some experimental setups do not allow for immediate freezing of samples. In this study, we evaluated methods to preserve fecal microbiome samples for metaproteomics analyses when flash-freezing is not possible. We collected fecal samples from C57BL/6 mice and stored them for 1 and 4 weeks using the following methods: flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen, immersion in RNA

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsChromatography, LiquidFecesFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPeptidesPreservation, BiologicalProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryBacterial ProteinsPeptidesgut microbesintestinal microbiomeLC-MS/MSmetaproteomicsmicrobiotasample preservationstorage

Identifiers

PMID34908431
PMCPMC8672883
OpenAlexW4225965635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.