Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908243›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2022

Translation and validation of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) in Serbia.

Ksenija Jovanovic, Nevena Kalezic, Sandra Sipetic Grujicic, Vladan Zivaljevic, Milan Jovanovic, Milica Savic, Zoran Bukumiric, Marko Dragas, Milos Sladojevic, Ranko Trailovic and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ksenija JovanovicCenter for Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Nevena KalezicCenter for Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sandra Sipetic GrujicicInstitute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladan ZivaljevicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milan JovanovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milica SavicCenter for Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Zoran BukumiricInstitute of Medical Statistics and Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marko DragasFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Milos SladojevicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ranko TrailovicCenter for Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Igor KoncarFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Lazar DavidovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSCenter for Health, Exercise and Sport Sciences · RSUniversity Clinical Centre · PLCentar za Promociju Nauke · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPreoperative anxiety is common and might affect surgical treatment outcomes. The aim was to translate and validate the Serbian version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS).

methodsFollowing translation and initial evaluation, the Serbian version (S-APAIS) was administered to 385 patients. Internal consistency, construct validity, prognostic criteria validity, and concurrent validity between S-APAIS and Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A) were evaluated.

resultsFactor analysis revealed two factors: APAIS-anesthesia (items 1, 2, 3) and APAIS-procedure (items 4, 5, 6). The whole scale, APAIS-anesthesia, and APAIS-procedure subscales showed an adequate level of internal consistency (Cronbach's αs: 0.787, 0.806, and 0.805, respectively). High concurrent validity was observed between APAIS-anesthesia and VAS-A (ρ = 0.628, p < .001). A moderate correlation was found between APAIS-procedure and VAS-A scale (ρ = 0.537, p < .001). At the cut-off point of 9, the area under the curve (AUC) of APAIS-anesthesia was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85, p < .001). For the APAIS-procedure, AUC was 0.772 (95% CI: 0.73-0.81, p < .001) at the cut-off point of 8.

conclusionThe structure of S-APAIS substantially differs from the original and allows separate measurement of anesthesia- and procedure-related anxieties. S-APAIS is a comprehensive, valid, and reliable instrument for the measurement of preoperative anxiety.

Indexed as

AnxietyTranslationsFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSerbiaSurveys and QuestionnairesAmsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS)preoperative anxietyreliabilityvalidityvisual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A)

Identifiers

PMID34908243
PMCPMC8785621
OpenAlexW4200496885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.