Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34908102›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2021

Sculpting with stem cells: how models of embryo development take shape.

Jesse V Veenvliet, Pierre-François Lenne, David A Turner, Iftach Nachman, Vikas Trivedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamical systems of fate and form in development.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Mechanics of Building Functional Organs.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Retinoid-enhanced human gastruloids.Nature cell biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Precise and scalable self-organization in mammalian pseudo-embryos.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jesse V VeenvlietStembryogenesis Lab, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1191-2975
Pierre-François LenneAix Marseille University, CNRS, IBDM, Turing Center for Living Systems, 13288, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1066-7506
David A TurnerInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, William Henry Duncan Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3447-7662
Iftach NachmanSchool of Neurobiology, Biochemistry and Biophysics, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Vikas TrivediEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratories (EMBL), Barcelona, 08003, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0953-0553

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/P001467/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During embryogenesis, organisms acquire their shape given boundary conditions that impose geometrical, mechanical and biochemical constraints. A detailed integrative understanding how these morphogenetic information modules pattern and shape the mammalian embryo is still lacking, mostly owing to the inaccessibility of the embryo in vivo for direct observation and manipulation. These impediments are circumvented by the developmental engineering of embryo-like structures (stembryos) from pluripotent stem cells that are easy to access, track, manipulate and scale. Here, we explain how unlocking distinct levels of embryo-like architecture through controlled modulations of the cellular environment enables the identification of minimal sets of mechanical and biochemical inputs necessary to pattern and shape the mammalian embryo. We detail how this can be complemented with precise measurements and manipulations of tissue biochemistry, mechanics and geometry across spatial and temporal scales to provide insights into the mechanochemical feedback loops governing embryo morphogenesis. Finally, we discuss how, even in the absence of active manipulations, stembryos display intrinsic phenotypic variability that can be leveraged to define the constraints that ensure reproducible morphogenesis in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentModels, BiologicalMorphogenesisPluripotent Stem CellsStem CellsEmbryogenesisGastruloidsMechanobiologyMorphogenesisNeural tubeOrganoidsSelf-organisationSomitogenesisStembryogenesisStem cells

Identifiers

PMID34908102
PMCPMC8722391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.