ArticleClinical spine surgery2022
Is There a Correlation Between Cobb Angle and Pulmonary Function Tests at 2-year Follow-up in Patients With Severe Spinal Deformity Treated by Posterior Vertebral Column Resection?
Article in Clinical spine surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Does Pulmonary Function Change in Patients With Severe Thoracic Scoliosis 2 Years After One-Stage Low-Grade Osteotomy and Posterior Corrective Surgery?Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Anesthetic Management of Patients After Scoliosis Surgery: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA retrospective study.
objectiveThe aim was to evaluate the relationships of Cobb angle and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) changes in severe spinal deformity and underwent posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No previous study focused on the correlation of deformity correction and PFTs changes in patients with cobb angle >90 degrees.
methodsPFTs values [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and percent-predicted values FVC%, FEV1%] were evaluated preoperative and at 2 years after PVCR. FVC% <80% were defined as restrictive ventilation dysfunction (RVD), the severity of RVD were divided into mild (FEV1% ≥70%), moderate (70% > FEV1% ≥50%) and severe (FEV1% <50%). The relationships among PFTs values improvements and all possible impact factors (mainly correction cobb angle) collected in this study were analyzed. PFTs data were compared among the 3 RVD subgroups (mild vs. moderate vs. severe) and between residual >30 versus <30 degrees.
resultsA total of 53 cases (28 male/25 female, mean ages 18.9 Y) underwent PVCR in one center from 2004 to 2016 were enrolled cobb angle. When 2 years after PVCR, average PFTs values showed significant improvements. PFTs values changes showed no correlation with correction rate and correction angle. The only significant impact factor in this study for FVC, FVC%, FEV1 improvements was preoperative FVC% and the only impact factor for FEV1% improvement was preoperative FEV1%, the relationships were negative. In accordance with the regression analysis, PFTs values improvements among the 3 RVD subgroups from high to low was severe>moderate>mild. However, patients with residual cobb angle <30 degrees had less PFTs values improvements than patients with residual cobb angle >30 degrees.
conclusionsTwo years after PVCR, PFTs values were significantly improved. There is no linear correlation between cobb angle change and PFTs values improvements. Lower preoperative FVC% and FEV1% indicate more PFTs values improvements at 2 years post-PVCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.