Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907902›Full record

ReviewThe journal of mental health policy and economics2021

PERSPECTIVE: Current US COVID-19 Pandemic Substance Use Research and Ideas for Research That May Help Us Learn More.

Sarah Q Duffy

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of mental health policy and economics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah Q DuffyNational Institutes of Health, 3WFN RM 08C54 MSC 6020, 301 North Stonestreet Ave, Bethesda MD 20892, USA, duffys@nida.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic likely had and will continue to have severe implications for those who use addictive substances, have substance use disorders, or use substance use related health care services. Policy and services research, particularly health economics research, can illuminate these effects on individuals, uncover the effects of the rapidly imposed changes in policy on how services were delivered, promote efficient and effective provision of services, and inform responses to future pandemics. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To identify potential substance use related effects of COVID-19 and pandemic mitigation policies, highlight themes in current research, and suggest areas for further high-quality policy and services research, with an emphasis on health economics research.

methodsReview of recent published commentaries, government documents, and initial research findings to describe potential impacts, and review of current COVID-19 related research grants funded by the United States National Institutes of Health to identify themes.

resultsPotential impacts include increased risk for and severity of COVID-19 illness among those who use substances, mitigation measures causing increased substance use and development of use disorders, and fundamental changes in the way treatment is provided. Current research may provide initial findings that may be useful in generating hypotheses for future rigorous research. DISCUSSION: Research on these and other areas could enhance our fundamental understanding of the needs of individuals who use substances and how to best address those needs in the most efficient, effective way. Though this brief review highlights some areas of potential interest, its focus is mainly on treatment and on the United States context. Research on additional services and contexts likely could inform advances as well. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE: Health care providers rapidly and under considerable stress made needed changes that likely mitigated SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Rigorous research can help determine what worked best and for whom, what could be kept, and what might better be discarded. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Research on the effects of mitigation policies may inform the development of policies to reduce negative effects when addressing future pandemics, whether to permanently allow at least some substance use treatment flexibilities, and whether research on other restrictive policies might lead to improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: This extraordinary event brought into sharp relief the numerous vulnerabilities of those who use substances and those with substance use disorders while also leading to vast changes in the services that address them. Rigorous research into those effects could result in significant improvements in policy and practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19Substance-Related DisordersHealth ServicesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United States

Identifiers

PMID34907902
PMCPMC8794236
OpenAlexW4200628658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.