Numbers, numerosities, and new directions.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The approximate number system represents magnitude2021
• Comment on
  Distinguishing the specific from the recognitional and the canonical, and the nature of ratios.2021
• Comment on
  Numerosities are not ersatz numbers.2021
• Comment on
  Second-order characteristics don't favor a number-representing ANS.2021
• Comment on
  The number sense does not represent numbers, but cardinality comparisons.2021
• Comment on
  Ratio-based perceptual foundations for rational numbers, and perhaps whole numbers, too?2021
• Comment on
  Numerical cognition: Unitary or diversified system(s)?2021
• Comment on
  Numbers in action.2021
• Comment on
  Real models: The limits of behavioural evidence for understanding the ANS.2021
• Comment on
  The perception of quantity ain't number: Missing the primacy of symbolic reference.2021
• Comment on
  What are we doing when we perceive numbers?2021
• Comment on
  Perceived number is not abstract.2021
• Comment on
  The number sense represents multitudes and magnitudes.2021
• Comment on
  Sizes, ratios, approximations: On what and how the ANS represents.2021
• Comment on
  Representation of pure magnitudes in ANS.2021
• Comment on
  Not so rational: A more natural way to understand the ANS.2021
• Comment on
  Numerical cognition needs more and better distinctions, not fewer.2021
• Comment on
  A rational explanation for links between the ANS and math.2021
• Comment on
  Positing numerosities may be metaphysically extravagant; positing representation of numerosities is not.2021
• Comment on
  Numerosity, area-osity, object-osity? Oh my.2021
• Comment on
  Contents of the approximate number system.2021
• Comment on
  The approximate number system represents rational numbers: The special case of an empty set.2021
• Comment on
  Weighted numbers.2021
• Comment on
  Constructing rationals through conjoint measurement of numerator and denominator as approximate integer magnitudes in tradeoff relations.2021
• Comment on
  Unwarranted philosophical assumptions in research on ANS.2021
• Comment on
  Non-symbolic and symbolic number and the approximate number system.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as