Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907796›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Integration of proprioceptive and visual feedback during online control of reaching.

Shoko Kasuga, Frédéric Crevecoeur, Kevin P Cross, Parsa Balalaie, Stephen H Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Online Movements Reflect Ongoing Deliberation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The microstructure of intra- and interpersonal coordination.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Preserved Metacognition for Undetected Visuomotor Deviations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shoko KasugaCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Frédéric CrevecoeurInstitute of Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-1153
Kevin P CrossCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9820-1043
Parsa BalalaieCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen H ScottCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8821-1843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual and proprioceptive feedback both contribute to perceptual decisions, but it remains unknown how these feedback signals are integrated together or consider factors such as delays and variance during online control. We investigated this question by having participants reach to a target with randomly applied mechanical and/or visual disturbances. We observed that the presence of visual feedback during a mechanical disturbance did not increase the size of the muscle response significantly but did decrease variance, consistent with a dynamic Bayesian integration model. In a control experiment, we verified that vision had a potent influence when mechanical and visual disturbances were both present but opposite in sign. These results highlight a complex process for multisensory integration, where visual feedback has a relatively modest influence when the limb is mechanically disturbed, but a substantial influence when visual feedback becomes misaligned with the limb.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleGoalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceUser-Computer InterfaceVisual PerceptionYoung Adultfeedback controlgoal-directed movementshumanmultisensory integrationstate estimation

Identifiers

PMID34907796
PMCPMC8794063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.