Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907724›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied biomedicine2020

Clinical comparison of platelet-rich plasma injection and daily celecoxib administration in the treatment of early knee osteoarthritis: A randomized clinical trial.

Ruben Reyes-Sosa, Agustin Lugo-Radillo, Lizzet Cruz-Santiago, Celia Rubi Garcia-Cruz, Oliver Mendoza-Cano

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruben Reyes-SosaInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Hospital General de Zona No. 1, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Agustin Lugo-RadilloCONACYT - Universidad Autonoma Benito Juarez de Oaxaca, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Lizzet Cruz-SantiagoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Hospital General de Zona No. 1, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Celia Rubi Garcia-CruzInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Hospital General de Zona No. 1, Oaxaca, Mexico.
Oliver Mendoza-CanoUniversidad de Colima, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Colima, Mexico.
Mexican Social Security Institute · MXConsejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías · MXUniversidad de Colima · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral and topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics and intra-articular corticosteroid injections are the recommended first line of treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA); however, they have serious side effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been posited as an effective and safer alternative treatment for knee OA. Hitherto, there is only one study comparing the effectiveness of PRP against an NSAID. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of PRP against celecoxib in the treatment of early knee OA.

methods60 patients with knee OA grade II and III were randomly alocated in two groups. Group 1 received one injection of autologous PRP in each affected knee, with a reinjection after 15 days; Group 2 received 200 mg of oral celecoxib each 24 h for a year. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and WOMAC subscales for pain, stiffness and function were measured at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the start of the treatment.

resultsAt the end of the study PRP was significantly better than celecoxib (p < 0.05) in improving VAS (40.40%), total WOMAC (58.95%) and WOMAC subscales of pain (50.60%), stiffness (34.13%) and function (51.90%). Significant differences remained after adjusting for age, sex or knee OA grade II or III.

conclusionsIntra-articular PRP is significantly better than celecoxib in improving pain, function and stiffness in early knee OA. This significant difference is independent of age, sex or knee OA grade II or III.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePlatelet-Rich PlasmaAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibHumansHyaluronic AcidPainTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCelecoxibHyaluronic AcidCelecoxibInflammationKneeOsteoarthritisPlatelet-Rich Plasma

Identifiers

PMID34907724
OpenAlexW3080615081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.