Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907705›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied biomedicine2020

A decision support system for the prediction of mortality in patients with acute kidney injury admitted in intensive care unit.

Selda Kayaalti, Omer Kayaalti, Bekir Hakan Aksebzeci

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selda KayaaltiDeveli Hatice-Muammer Kocaturk Public Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Develi, Kayseri, Turkey.
Omer KayaaltiKayseri University, Develi Huseyin Sahin Vocational College, Department of Computer Technologies, Kayseri, Turkey.
Bekir Hakan AksebzeciAbdullah Gul University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) is a very special unit of a hospital, where healthcare professionals provide treatment and, later, close follow-up to the patients. It is crucial to estimate mortality in ICU patients from many viewpoints. The purpose of this study is to classify the status of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) in ICU as early mortality, late mortality, and survival by the application of Classification and Regression Trees (CART) algorithm to the patients' attributes such as blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, serum and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), gamma-glutamyl transferase, laboratory electrolytes, blood gas, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure and demographic details of patients. This study was conducted 50 patients with AKI who were followed up in the ICU. The study also aims to determine the significance of relationship between the attributes used in the prediction of mortality in CART and patients' status by employing the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of CART for the tested attributes for the prediction of early mortality, late mortality, and survival of patients were 90.00%, 83.33%, and 91.67%, respectively. The values of both urine NGAL and LDH on day 7 showed a considerable difference according to the patients' status after being examined by the Kruskal-Wallis H test.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryClassification and regression treesLactate dehydrogenaseMortality predictionNeutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.