Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907517›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2022

Cumulus Cell DNA Damage as an Index of Human Oocyte Competence.

Alejandro Baratas, Jaime Gosálvez, Moises de la Casa, Silvia Camacho, Monica Dorado-Silva, Stephen D Johnston, Rosa Roy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Oocyte-cumulus cell interaction: a key factor in early embryo development.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandro BaratasBiology Department, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jaime GosálvezBiology Department, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Moises de la CasaGINEFIV, Assisted Reproduction Centre, Madrid, Spain.
Silvia CamachoGINEFIV, Assisted Reproduction Centre, Madrid, Spain.
Monica Dorado-SilvaGINEMED, Assisted Reproduction Centre, Sevilla, Spain.
Stephen D JohnstonSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Rosa RoyBiology Department, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. rosa.roy@uam.es.ORCID 0000-0003-0729-3849
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of oocyte quality is crucial for achieving effective syngamy post-sperm injection and embryonic development. Cumulus cells (CCs) have been proposed as biomarkers of oocyte quality because of their close bio-dynamic relationship with the oocyte. To determine the quality of the oocyte, CCs were sampled during oocyte preparation for ICSI to determine a CC DNA fragmentation index (CCDFI) of each individual oocyte using a variant of the chromatin dispersion test. One hundred and thirty oocytes were selected and studied from two Spanish fertility clinics, 90 of which were fertilized and developed to embryos. Significant differences were found between the CCDFI of unfertilized and fertilized oocytes (p < .001) and between the CCDFI of embryos that were discarded and those that developed suitable for transfer or cryopreservation (p < .001). Oocyte quality was negatively correlated with CCDFI (Spearman's rho =  - 0.45; p < .001). Receiver operator characteristics curves (ROC) suggested that a cut-off value of 24% CCDFI was able to discriminate the capacity of the gametes to result in syngamy with a sensitivity and specificity of 75.6% and 65%, respectively. This cut-off supports the application of CCDFI as potential index for the evaluation of the reproductive potential of oocytes prior to fertilization.

Indexed as

Cumulus CellsSemenDNA DamageFemaleFertilizationHumansMaleOocytesPregnancyBiomarkerCumulus cells (CCs)DNA fragmentationEmbryo qualityIVF/ICSIOocyte quality

Identifiers

PMID34907517
PMCPMC9646542
OpenAlexW4200363368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.