Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907502›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Management of difficult and failed intubation in the general surgical population: a historical cohort study in a tertiary care centre.

Ashok Kumar Jayaraj, Naveed Siddiqui, Sameh Mohammed Osman Abdelghany, Mrinalini Balki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashok Kumar JayarajAdvanced Airway Management, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Naveed SiddiquiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sameh Mohammed Osman AbdelghanyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mrinalini BalkiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and Department of Physiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Room 7-405, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X5, Canada. mrinalini.balki@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6568-021X
Mount Sinai Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to describe the incidence, management, and complications of difficult and failed endotracheal intubation in a general surgical population.

methodsThis historical cohort study included all cases of difficult endotracheal intubation in general surgical patients at Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, ON, Canada) from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2017. Patient charts and electronic records were reviewed to collect data on airway management and complications. Endotracheal intubation was graded as "difficult" if more than two attempts with direct laryngoscopy or if additional equipment for second or subsequent attempts was required, and "failed" if it could not be achieved despite the attempts. The primary outcome was the incidence of difficult and failed intubation. The secondary outcomes were complications, difficult airway parameters, mask ventilation, number of intubation attempts, and rescue devices including the eventually successful method.

resultsWe identified 111 cases of difficult intubation (0.26%) and 14 cases of failed intubation (0.03%) in 42,805 surgical cases requiring endotracheal intubation over the seven-year period. The incidence was highest in 2012 (0.36%) and lowest in 2017 (0.13%). Difficulty was anticipated in 84 (76%) patients. The median (range) number of intubation attempts was 2 (2-5). Videolaryngoscopy was the eventually successful method in those with unsuccessful first attempt direct laryngoscopy (n = 91) and videolaryngoscopy (n = 17) in 71% and 77% cases, respectively. Intubation failed in 14 patients, three of whom required a surgical airway because the lungs could not be ventilated. Poor visualization of the glottis (93%) and airway bleeding (36%) were the leading causes of failed intubation. Desaturation was seen in 8%, airway bleeding in 7%, and airway edema in 6% of cases of difficult intubation.

conclusionThe incidences of difficult and failed intubations in our study were 2.6 and 0.3 per 1,000 surgeries requiring laryngoscopies, respectively, with a decrease over time. Videolaryngoscopy showed a high success rate as a rescue device.

Indexed as

LaryngoscopesLaryngoscopyAirway ManagementCohort StudiesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealTertiary Care Centersairway managementdifficult intubationfailed intubation

Identifiers

PMID34907502
OpenAlexW4200240695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.