Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907421›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2022

Touched by loneliness-how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study.

Nira Saporta, Leehe Peled-Avron, Dirk Scheele, Jana Lieberz, René Hurlemann, Simone G Shamay-Tsoory

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Loneliness and socioemotional memory.The British journal of social psychology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Decreased self-reported receiving of social touch and social support predict loneliness in healthy adults.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nira SaportaSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Leehe Peled-AvronSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-1031
Dirk ScheeleDivision of Medical Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn 53105, Germany.
Jana LieberzDivision of Medical Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn 53105, Germany.
René HurlemannDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg 26129, Germany.
Simone G Shamay-TsoorySchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
University of Haifa · ILCarl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of observed human touch. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) is part of an observation-execution network implicated in observed touch perception. Correlative studies also point to rIFG's involvement in loneliness. We examined the causal effect of rIFG anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on high- and low-loneliness individuals observing human touch. In a cross-over design study, 40 participants watched pictures of humans or objects touching or not touching during anodal and sham stimulations. Participants indicated whether pictures contained humans or objects, and their reaction time was measured. Results show that the reaction time of low-loneliness individuals to observed human touch was significantly slower during anodal stimulation compared to high-loneliness individuals, possibly due to them being more emotionally distracted by it. Lonely individuals also reported less liking of touch. Our findings support the notion that lonely individuals are not drawn to positive social cues. This may help explain the perpetuation of loneliness, despite social opportunities that could be available to lonely people.

Indexed as

Touch PerceptionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationEmotionsHumansLonelinessTouchaffective touchinferior frontal gyruslonelinesstDCS

Identifiers

PMID34907421
PMCPMC8824677
OpenAlexW4200155043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.