Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907284›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Cognitive profiling and proteomic analysis of the modafinil analogue S-CE-123 in experienced aged rats.

István Gyertyán, Jana Lubec, Alíz Judit Ernyey, Christopher Gerner, Ferenc Kassai, Predrag Kalaba, Kata Kozma, Iva Cobankovic, Gábor Brenner, Judith Wackerlig and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

István GyertyánDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4., Budapest, 1089, Hungary. gyertyan.istvan@med.semmelweis-univ.hu.
Jana LubecProgramme of Proteomics, Department of Neuroproteomics, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Alíz Judit ErnyeyDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4., Budapest, 1089, Hungary.
Christopher GernerDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ferenc KassaiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4., Budapest, 1089, Hungary.
Predrag KalabaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kata KozmaDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4., Budapest, 1089, Hungary.
Iva CobankovicDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gábor BrennerDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4., Budapest, 1089, Hungary.
Judith WackerligDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva FranschitzDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ernst UrbanDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Thierry LangerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jovana MalikovicCore Unit of Biomedical Research, Division of Laboratory Animal Science and Genetics, Medical University of Vienna, Himberg, Austria.
Gert LubecProgramme of Proteomics, Department of Neuroproteomics, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. gert.lubec@lubeclab.com.
University of Vienna · ATSemmelweis University · HUParacelsus Medical University · ATMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of novel cognitive enhancer drugs in the clinic highlights the prediction problems of animal assays. The objective of the current study was to test a putative cognitive enhancer in a rodent cognitive test system with improved translational validity and clinical predictivity. Cognitive profiling was complemented with post mortem proteomic analysis. Twenty-seven male Lister Hooded rats (26 months old) having learned several cognitive tasks were subchronically treated with S-CE-123 (CE-123) in a randomized blind experiment. Rats were sacrificed after the last behavioural procedure and plasma and brains were collected. A label-free quantification approach was used to characterize proteomic changes in the synaptosomal fraction of the prefrontal cortex. CE-123 markedly enhanced motivation which resulted in superior performance in a new-to-learn operant discrimination task and in a cooperation assay of social cognition, and mildly increased impulsivity. The compound did not affect attention, spatial and motor learning. Proteomic quantification revealed 182 protein groups significantly different between treatment groups containing several proteins associated with aging and neurodegeneration. Bioinformatic analysis showed the most relevant clusters delineating synaptic vesicle recycling, synapse organisation and antioxidant activity. The cognitive profile of CE-123 mapped by the test system resembles that of modafinil in the clinic showing the translational validity of the test system. The findings of modulated synaptic systems are paralleling behavioral results and are in line with previous evidence for the role of altered synaptosomal protein groups in mechanisms of cognitive function.

Indexed as

ModafinilAgingAnimalsBenzhydryl CompoundsCognitionLearningMalePrefrontal CortexRatsBenzhydryl CompoundsCE-123Modafinil

Identifiers

PMID34907284
PMCPMC8671572
OpenAlexW4200164583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.