ArticleScientific reports2021
Comparison between rigid and soft poly-articulated prosthetic hands in non-expert myo-electric users shows advantages of soft robotics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- A high-dexterity soft neuroprosthetic hand for daily activities.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Overview of an ongoing clinical trial on hand prostheses: Toward use of synergy-based prosthetic hands for activities of daily living by transradial amputees.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Fabrication of Soft Robotics by Additive Manufacturing: From Materials to Applications.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Preparation duration shapes the goal-directed tuning of stretch reflex responses.Experimental brain research · 2025Article
- Toward developing a compact total artificial heart using a soft robotic fluidic transmission system.Science advances · 2025Article
- Quantifying the Cognitive Demand of Controlling a Prosthesis with a Secondary Detection Response Task.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025Article
- A Highly Efficient HMI Algorithm for Controlling a Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Prosthetic Hand Using Sonomyography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Soft Robotics in Upper Limb Neurorehabilitation and Assistance: Current Clinical Evidence and Recommendations.Soft robotics · 2025Review
- Replacement as an aging intervention.Nature aging · 2025Review
- Article
- Pioneering healthcare with soft robotic devices: A review.Smart medicine · 2024Review
- Simulation and experimental study on rope driven artificial hand and driven motor.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- Force prediction in the cylindrical grip for a model of hand prosthesis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The SoftHand Pro platform: a flexible prosthesis with a user-centered approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- A Proposal of Bioinspired Soft Active Hand Prosthesis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Functional assessment of current upper limb prostheses: An integrated clinical and technological perspective.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Notwithstanding the advancement of modern bionic hands and the large variety of prosthetic hands in the market, commercial devices still present limited acceptance and percentage of daily use. While commercial prostheses present rigid mechanical structures, emerging trends in the design of robotic hands are moving towards soft technologies. Although this approach is inspired by nature and could be promising for prosthetic applications, there is scant literature concerning its benefits for end-users and in real-life scenarios. In this work, we evaluate and assess the role and the benefits of soft robotic technologies in the field of prosthetics. We propose a thorough comparison between rigid and soft characteristics of two poly-articulated hands in 5 non-expert myo-electric prosthesis users in pre- and post-therapeutic training conditions. The protocol includes two standard functional assessments, three surveys for user-perception, and three customized tests to evaluate the sense of embodiment. Results highlight that rigid hands provide a more precise grasp, while soft properties show higher functionalities thanks to their adaptability to different requirements, intuitive use and more natural execution of activities of daily living. This comprehensive evaluation suggests that softness could also promote a quick integration of the system in non-expert users.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.