Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907193›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Simultaneous estimation of bi-directional causal effects and heritable confounding from GWAS summary statistics.

Liza Darrous, Ninon Mounier, Zoltán Kutalik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A focusing framework for testing bi-directional causal effects in Mendelian randomization.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liza Darrous *University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-4127
Ninon Mounier *University Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-5402
Zoltán KutalikUniversity Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. zoltan.kutalik@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8285-7523

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mendelian Randomisation (MR) is an increasingly popular approach that estimates the causal effect of risk factors on complex human traits. While it has seen several extensions that relax its basic assumptions, most suffer from two major limitations; their under-exploitation of genome-wide markers, and sensitivity to the presence of a heritable confounder of the exposure-outcome relationship. To overcome these limitations, we propose a Latent Heritable Confounder MR (LHC-MR) method applicable to association summary statistics, which estimates bi-directional causal effects, direct heritabilities, and confounder effects while accounting for sample overlap. We demonstrate that LHC-MR outperforms several existing MR methods in a wide range of simulation settings and apply it to summary statistics of 13 complex traits. Besides several concordant results with other MR methods, LHC-MR unravels new mechanisms (how disease diagnosis might lead to improved lifestyle) and reveals new causal effects (e.g. HDL cholesterol being protective against high systolic blood pressure), hidden from standard MR methods due to a heritable confounder of opposite effect direction.

Indexed as

CausalityCholesterol, HDLComputer SimulationGenetic PleiotropyGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansHypertensionMendelian Randomization AnalysisModels, StatisticalMultifactorial InheritanceCholesterol, HDL

Identifiers

PMID34907193
PMCPMC8671515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.