Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907101›Full record

ReviewAnnals of laboratory medicine2022

Current Issues, Challenges, and Future Perspectives of Genetic Counseling in Korea.

Namhee Kim, Sun-Young Kong, Jongha Yoo, Do-Hoon Kim, Soo Hyun Seo, Jieun Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global trends and themes in genetic counseling research.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Namhee KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Dong-A University Medical Center, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0844-5058
Sun-Young KongDepartment of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0620-4058
Jongha YooDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Health Insurance Service, Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-0543
Do-Hoon KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9854-7850
Soo Hyun SeoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-4967
Jieun KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7794-3475
Dong-A University · KRKeimyung University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing has become increasingly integrated into all areas of healthcare, and complex genetic testing usage continues to grow; thus, the demand for genetic counseling (GC) is likely to increase. However, it is unclear whether the current clinical GC capacity is sufficient for meeting the existing demand. This review describes the current issues, challenges, and future perspectives of GC in Korea based on a professional survey conducted among laboratory physicians. In view of the growing GC demand in the clinical setting, participants expressed a concern about the lack of support from the national healthcare insurance policy and legal requirements, such as certification, for GC practice. The implementation of genetic testing in the overall healthcare system in Korea is in an early phase. Proper implementation can be achieved through education and training of specialists, collaboration among healthcare personnel, proper regulatory oversight, genomic policies, and public awareness. Understanding the current GC capacity, issues, and challenges is a prerequisite for effective strategic planning by healthcare systems considering the expected growth in the demand for clinical genetic services over the next few decades.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingPhysiciansDelivery of Health CareGenetic TestingHumansRepublic of KoreaGenetic counselingGenetic servicesHealthcare systemPolicySpecialists

Identifiers

PMID34907101
PMCPMC8677483
OpenAlexW4200404412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.