Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34907036›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Exploring the feasibility of establishing a core set of sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health indicators in humanitarian settings: a multimethods, multicountry qualitative study protocol.

Loulou Hassan Kobeissi, Manizha Ashna, Kassandre Messier, Allisyn C Moran, Lale Say, Kathleen Louise Strong, Angel Foster

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Loulou Hassan Kobeissi *Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, Organisation mondiale de la Sante, Geneve, Switzerland kobeissil@who.int.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-7529
Manizha AshnaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kassandre MessierFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Allisyn C MoranDepartment of Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Aging, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lale SayReproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kathleen Louise StrongDepartment of Maternal, Child, Adolescent Health and Aging, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Angel Foster *Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn 2019, over 70 million people were forcibly displaced worldwide. Women and girls comprise nearly half of this population and are at heightened risk of negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes. With the collapse of health systems, reduced resources and increased vulnerabilities from displacement, there is a need to strengthen current practices and ensure the delivery of comprehensive sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health (SRMNCAH) services. Recognising the need for consistency in data collection, analysis and use, the WHO developed a list of core SRMNCAH monitoring and evaluation indicators for services and outcomes in humanitarian settings. This research will explore the feasibility of collecting this core set of SRMNCAH indicators in displacement contexts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will undertake a multimethods qualitative study in seven humanitarian settings: Afghanistan, Albania, Bangladesh, Cameroon, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iraq and Jordan. We selected sites that reflect diversity in geographic region, sociocultural characteristics, primary location(s) of displaced persons and nature and phase of the crisis. Our study consists of four components: key informant interviews, facility assessments, observational sessions at select facilities and focus group discussions with front-line healthcare personnel. We will analyse our data using descriptive statistics and for content and themes. We will begin by analysing data from each setting separately and will then combine these data to explore concordant and discordant results, triangulate findings and develop global recommendations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Ottawa's Research Ethics Board and the Research Project Review Panel (RP 2) of the World Health Organization-Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health as well as local IRBs of PIs' research institutions reviewed and approved this protocol. We intend to disseminate findings through workshops at the WHO country, regional and headquarter levels, as well as through local, national and international conferences, workshops, peer-reviewed publications, and reports.

Indexed as

Reproductive Health ServicesSexual HealthAdolescentAdolescent HealthChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornObservational Studies as TopicReproductive Healthreproductive medicinesexual medicinestatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID34907036
PMCPMC8671919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.