Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906991›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Conceptualizing success factors for patient engagement in patient medical homes: a cross-sectional survey.

Nadiya Sunderji, Allyson Ion, Vincent Tang, Jennifer Rayner, Carol Mulder, Noah Ivers, Akram Alyass

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadiya SunderjiWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. nsunderji@waypointcentre.ca.
Allyson IonWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Vincent TangWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Jennifer RaynerWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Carol MulderWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Noah IversWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
Akram AlyassWaypoint Centre for Mental Health Care (Sunderji); Department of Psychiatry (Sunderji, Tang) University of Toronto; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health (Sunderji), Toronto, Ont.; McMaster University School of Social Work (Ion), Hamilton, Ont.; St. Michael's Hospital Mental Health Research Group (Ion), Toronto, Ont.; Research and Evaluation (Rayner), Alliance for Healthier Communities, Toronto, Ont.; Centre for Studies in Family Medicine (Rayner), Western University, London, Ont.; Queen's University (Mulder), Kingston, Ont.; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Ivers), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (Alyass), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

Funding

Canadian Institutes for Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient engagement is a priority for health care quality improvement and health system design, but many organizations struggle to engage patients meaningfully. We describe patient engagement activities and success factors that influence organizational decision-making in Ontario's patient medical homes.

methodsFrom March to May 2018, we conducted an online survey focused on practice-level patient engagement that targeted primary care organization leaders at all Ontario family health teams, community health centres, nurse practitioner-led clinics and Aboriginal Health Access Centres. We asked questions from the Measuring Organizational Readiness for Engagement (MORE) and Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) questionnaires. We used factor and mediation analysis to identify organizational conditions and activities that are associated with the outcomes of patient engagement, affecting board decisions, program-level decisions and the formation of collaborative partnerships.

resultsWe achieved a 53% response rate (

interpretationBased on the perceptions of primary care leaders, organizational structures and processes are related to successful patient engagement. Organizations that seek to improve patient engagement should assess their commitment and follow-through with associated resources and activities.

Indexed as

Decision MakingCommunity Health CentersCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOntarioPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionQuality ImprovementSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34906991
PMCPMC8687489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.