Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906959›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2021

Innocuous presentation of ameloblastic carcinoma.

Swagatika Panda, Rupsa Das, Diksha Mohapatra, Neeta Mohanty

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 73% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swagatika PandaOral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Rupsa DasOral Medicine & Radiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Diksha MohapatraOral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Neeta MohantyOral and Maxillofacial Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha O Anusandhan deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India neetamohanty@soa.ac.in.
Siksha O Anusandhan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ameloblastic carcinoma is a rare malignant odontogenic neoplasm that exhibits diverse clinical and radiological presentations. In fact there are several differential diagnoses during histopathological evaluation too. Lack of adequate reports could not establish the predominant demographic, clinical and radiological presentations. For the same reasons, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is also unsubstantiated yet. This case discusses the innocuous clinical and radiological presentation of ameloblastic carcinoma in a 55-year-old man where the diagnostic confirmation was achieved through histopathological evaluation. The differential diagnoses, treatment and follow-up details of this case are discussed in light of the previous published case reports and systematic reviews of case reports in an attempt to increase the sensitisation among dentists towards ameloblastic carcinoma.

Indexed as

AmeloblastomaCarcinomaMandibular NeoplasmsOdontogenic TumorsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMaleMiddle Ageddentistry and oral medicinehead and neck cancerpathology

Identifiers

PMID34906959
PMCPMC8671920
OpenAlexW4200323279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.