Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906918›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2022

SERV-CT: A disparity dataset from cone-beam CT for validation of endoscopic 3D reconstruction.

P J Eddie Edwards, Dimitris Psychogyios, Stefanie Speidel, Lena Maier-Hein, Danail Stoyanov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Stereo matching of binocular laparoscopic images with improved densely connected neural architecture search.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A Monocular Variable Magnifications 3D Laparoscope System Using Double Liquid Lenses.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

P J Eddie EdwardsWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK. Electronic address: eddie.edwards@ucl.ac.uk.
Dimitris PsychogyiosWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK.
Stefanie SpeidelDivision of Translational Surgical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
Lena Maier-HeinDivision of Medical and Biological Informatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Danail StoyanovWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203145Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In computer vision, reference datasets from simulation and real outdoor scenes have been highly successful in promoting algorithmic development in stereo reconstruction. Endoscopic stereo reconstruction for surgical scenes gives rise to specific problems, including the lack of clear corner features, highly specular surface properties and the presence of blood and smoke. These issues present difficulties for both stereo reconstruction itself and also for standardised dataset production. Previous datasets have been produced using computed tomography (CT) or structured light reconstruction on phantom or ex vivo models. We present a stereo-endoscopic reconstruction validation dataset based on cone-beam CT (SERV-CT). Two ex vivo small porcine full torso cadavers were placed within the view of the endoscope with both the endoscope and target anatomy visible in the CT scan. Subsequent orientation of the endoscope was manually aligned to match the stereoscopic view and benchmark disparities, depths and occlusions are calculated. The requirement of a CT scan limited the number of stereo pairs to 8 from each ex vivo sample. For the second sample an RGB surface was acquired to aid alignment of smooth, featureless surfaces. Repeated manual alignments showed an RMS disparity accuracy of around 2 pixels and a depth accuracy of about 2 mm. A simplified reference dataset is provided consisting of endoscope image pairs with corresponding calibration, disparities, depths and occlusions covering the majority of the endoscopic image and a range of tissue types, including smooth specular surfaces, as well as significant variation of depth. We assessed the performance of various stereo algorithms from online available repositories. There is a significant variation between algorithms, highlighting some of the challenges of surgical endoscopic images. The SERV-CT dataset provides an easy to use stereoscopic validation for surgical applications with smooth reference disparities and depths covering the majority of the endoscopic image. This complements existing resources well and we hope will aid the development of surgical endoscopic anatomical reconstruction algorithms.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyImaging, Three-DimensionalAnimalsEndoscopyHumansPhantoms, ImagingSwineTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer-assisted interventionsCT validationStereo 3D reconstructionSurgical endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID34906918
PMCPMC8961000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.