Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906660›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of arthroplasty2022

A Psycholgical Intervention Delivered by Automated Mobile Phone Messaging Stabilized Hip and Knee Function During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chris A Anthony, Edward Rojas, Natalie Glass, Valerie Keffala, Nicholas Noiseux, Jacob Elkins, Timothy S Brown, Nicholas A Bedard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Virtual Tools to Enable Management of Knee Osteoarthritis.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chris A AnthonyDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Edward RojasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Natalie GlassDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Valerie KeffalaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Nicholas NoiseuxDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Jacob ElkinsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Timothy S BrownDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Nicholas A BedardDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) delivered via a mobile phone messaging robot to patients who had their total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty procedures postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsNinety patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty who experienced surgical delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic were randomized to the ACT group, receiving 14 days of twice daily automated mobile phone messages, or the control group, who received no messages. Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in preintervention and postintervention patient-reported outcome measures were utilized to evaluate the intervention.

resultsThirty-eight percent of ACT group participants improved and achieved MCID on the Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Information System Physical Health compared to 17.5% in the control group (P = .038; number needed to treat [NNT] 5). For the joint-specific Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), 24% of the ACT group achieved MCID compared to 2.5% in the control group (P = .004; NNT 5). An improvement in the KOOS JR was found in 29% of the ACT group compared to 4.2% in the control group (P = .028; NNT 5). Fourteen percent of the ACT group participants experienced a clinical important decline in the KOOS JR compared to 41.7% in the control group (P = .027; NNT 4).

conclusionA psychological intervention delivered via a text messaging robot improved physical function and prevented decline in patient-reported outcome measures in patients who experienced an unexpected surgical delay during the COVID-19 pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Indexed as

Acceptance and Commitment TherapyArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCell PhoneCOVID-19Osteoarthritis, KneeHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19hip arthritistelemedicinetext messagingTHATKA

Identifiers

PMID34906660
PMCPMC8665663
OpenAlexW4200040478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.