ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2022
Improved provider preparedness through an 8-part genetics and genomic education program.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- A qualitative study of unaffected ATM and CHEK2 carriers: How participants make meaning of 'moderate risk' genetic results in a population breast cancer screening trial.Journal of genetic counseling · 2022Trial
- AI in variant analysis: fast track to genetic diagnoses.Human genetics · 2026Review
- Translating multi-omics into healthcare: requisites for scalable and equitable implementation.Human genomics · 2026Review
- Clinician Satisfaction With Pharmacogenomics Clinical Services at a Multistate Health System.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Case-based genomics education and training of neurologists: an Egyptian initiative.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Analyzing the impact of pharmacogenomics-guided nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug alerts in clinical practice.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Health care providers' experiences with genetic testing in patients at risk for hereditary angioedema.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025Article
- Genetic and Genomic Literacy of Healthcare Providers Treating Anorexia Nervosa in the United States: A Mixed Methods, Cross-Sectional Study.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Familial communication and cascade testing following elective genomic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Primary Care Providers' Experiences With an Active Elective Genetic Testing Program.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025Article
- Age-Based Genomic Screening: Pediatric Providers' Perspectives on Implementation.Public health genomics · 2025Article
- Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of patients who received elective genomic testing as a clinical service.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024Article
- Clinical impact of preemptive pharmacogenomic testing on antiplatelet therapy in a real-world setting.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024Article
- Growth in perceived clinical genetics competency among primary care providers participating in genomic population health screening.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of pharmacogenetic automated clinical decision support for clopidogrel.Pharmacogenomics · 2024Article
- Delivery of a national prenatal exome sequencing service in England: a mixed methods study exploring healthcare professionals' views and experiences.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- The landscape of reported VUS in multi-gene panel and genomic testing: Time for a change.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023Article
- Attitudes about pharmacogenomic testing vary by healthcare specialty.Pharmacogenomics · 2023Article
- Are Graduate Medical Trainees Prepared for the Personalized Genomic Medicine Revolution? Trainee Perspectives at One Institution.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeLarge-scale genetics education appropriate for general practice providers is a growing priority. We describe the content and impact of a mandatory system-wide program implemented at Sanford Health.
methodsThe Imagenetics Initiative at Sanford Health developed a 2-year genetics education program with quarterly web-based modules that were mandatory for all physicians and advanced practice providers. Scores of 0 to 5 were calculated for each module on the basis of the number of objectives that the participants reported as fulfilled. In addition, the participants completed surveys before starting and after finishing the education program, which included a 7-item measure scored 7 to 28 on the perceived preparedness to practice genetics.
resultsBetween 2252 and 2822 Sanford Health employees completed each of the 8 quarterly education modules. The ratings were highest for the module about using genomics to improve patient management (mean score = 4.3) and lowest for the module about different types of genetic tests and specialists. The mean perceived preparedness scores increased from 15.7 at pre-education to 19.1 at post-education (P < .001).
conclusionWeb-based genetics education was highly effective in increasing health care providers' confidence about using genetics. Both comfort with personal knowledge and confidence regarding access to the system's genomic medicine experts increased significantly. The results demonstrate how scalable approaches can improve provider preparedness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.