Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34906215›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2021

A guide to enteral nutrition in intensive care units: 10 expert tips for the daily practice.

Jean-Charles Preiser, Yaseen M Arabi, Mette M Berger, Michael Casaer, Stephen McClave, Juan C Montejo-González, Sandra Peake, Annika Reintam Blaser, Greet Van den Berghe, Arthur van Zanten and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Australasian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Consensus statements on refeeding syndrome.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The application of continuous enteral nutrition during sequential chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Prognostic Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance and Adverse Outcomes in Neurocritical Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jean-Charles PreiserErasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 Route de Lennik, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. jean-charles.preiser@erasme.ulb.ac.be.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-0390
Yaseen M ArabiIntensive Care Department, College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-6241
Mette M BergerAdult Intensive Care, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-1648
Michael CasaerClinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7087-0795
Stephen McClaveDepartment of Medicine, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA.
Juan C Montejo-GonzálezIntensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación imas12, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1271-9974
Sandra PeakeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, SA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6682-7973
Annika Reintam BlaserDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1211-7372
Greet Van den BergheClinical Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5320-1362
Arthur van ZantenEde and Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6276-7192
Jan WernermanDivision of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paul WischmeyerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3369-7911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preferential use of the oral/enteral route in critically ill patients over gut rest is uniformly recommended and applied. This article provides practical guidance on enteral nutrition in compliance with recent American and European guidelines. Low-dose enteral nutrition can be safely started within 48 h after admission, even during treatment with small or moderate doses of vasopressor agents. A percutaneous access should be used when enteral nutrition is anticipated for ≥ 4 weeks. Energy delivery should not be calculated to match energy expenditure before day 4-7, and the use of energy-dense formulas can be restricted to cases of inability to tolerate full-volume isocaloric enteral nutrition or to patients who require fluid restriction. Low-dose protein (max 0.8 g/kg/day) can be provided during the early phase of critical illness, while a protein target of > 1.2 g/kg/day could be considered during the rehabilitation phase. The occurrence of refeeding syndrome should be assessed by daily measurement of plasma phosphate, and a phosphate drop of 30% should be managed by reduction of enteral feeding rate and high-dose thiamine. Vomiting and increased gastric residual volume may indicate gastric intolerance, while sudden abdominal pain, distension, gastrointestinal paralysis, or rising abdominal pressure may indicate lower gastrointestinal intolerance.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionIntensive Care UnitsCritical IllnessFood, FormulatedHumansResidual VolumeCritically illEnergy metabolismGastrointestinal dysfunctionMuscle wastingRefeeding syndromeSarcopeniaStress response

Identifiers

PMID34906215
PMCPMC8669237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.